2021
DOI: 10.1186/s43055-021-00434-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medium-term chest computed tomography (CT) follow-up of COVID-19 pneumonia patients after recovery to assess the rate of resolution and determine the potential predictors of persistent lung changes

Abstract: Background The data on medium-term follow-up of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pneumonia survivors is scarce. Medium-term follow-up will generate knowledge and help in devising a structured follow-up plan and to facilitate enrolment in clinical trials assessing the role of antifibrotic drugs in modifying the course of disease in order to avert long-term pulmonary sequelae of disease. The study was aimed to evaluate the lung findings on a medium-term follow-up (3 months or more) chest compute… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Various CT findings have been reported related to COVID-19 pneumonia with mild to severe lung involvement. Some previous studies also alluded to fibrotic consequences following the infection, which is a considerable issue for the patients’ clinical outcomes [ 5 , 6 ]. For example, a study reported that about one third of the COVID-19 survivors showed fibrotic abnormalities in their CT scans within the 6-month follow-up [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various CT findings have been reported related to COVID-19 pneumonia with mild to severe lung involvement. Some previous studies also alluded to fibrotic consequences following the infection, which is a considerable issue for the patients’ clinical outcomes [ 5 , 6 ]. For example, a study reported that about one third of the COVID-19 survivors showed fibrotic abnormalities in their CT scans within the 6-month follow-up [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to 50% of survivors of SARS CoV-2 infection have residual radiological abnormalities more than 3 months after initial infection, similar to previous coronavirus infections, such as SARS and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) (5,(9)(10)(11)(12). Older age, pre-existing co-morbidities, longer hospitalization, ICU admission, and a lower rate of steroid administration were more frequently associated with persistent imaging abnormalities (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Up to 50% of survivors of SARS CoV-2 infection have residual radiological abnormalities more than 3 months after initial infection, similar to previous coronavirus infections, such as SARS and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) ( 5 , 9 12 ). Older age, pre-existing co-morbidities, longer hospitalization, ICU admission, and a lower rate of steroid administration were more frequently associated with persistent imaging abnormalities ( 10 ). Commonly reported post-acute radiological sequelae include ground-glass opacities and reticulations, mosaic attenuation, parenchymal bands, interlobular septal thickening, bronchiectasis, and fibrotic-like changes ( 4 , 5 , 10 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, a retrospective cohort study of 81 COVID-19 pneumonia patients from India found that almost half (43.2%) of the patients had residual lung changes at 3 months or more (range 90-111 days) on follow-up CT, ground-glass opacity being the most common finding. All patients in this study had CT scan at the time of the hospital admission and at 3 months or over (for those who had persistent symptoms or CXR changes at follow-up), which indicate that only patients with a higher degree of disease severity on admission were analysed [ 17 ]. When comparing the persistence of symptoms between the patients with resolved and residual lung findings at follow-up, this study did not demonstrate any statistically significant difference between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%