2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.vehcom.2015.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medium access control protocols for safety applications in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Network: A classification and comprehensive survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That means, more is the speed of the vehicle (and therefore the cluster to which it belongs), higher will be the priority it will gain over other vehicles which have comparatively lower mobility range. Gupta et al (2015) discuss several CW-based priority assignment schemes which reinforce the validity and genuineness of our proposed protocol. In this methodology, we implement an adaptive MAC mechanism in which the minimum and maximum CW parameters are dynamically tuned based on the mobility of the clustered nodes.…”
Section: Adaptive Contention Windowmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…That means, more is the speed of the vehicle (and therefore the cluster to which it belongs), higher will be the priority it will gain over other vehicles which have comparatively lower mobility range. Gupta et al (2015) discuss several CW-based priority assignment schemes which reinforce the validity and genuineness of our proposed protocol. In this methodology, we implement an adaptive MAC mechanism in which the minimum and maximum CW parameters are dynamically tuned based on the mobility of the clustered nodes.…”
Section: Adaptive Contention Windowmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Figures 5 compare the end-to-end delay of the proposed ICDC protocol with those of other protocols under evaluation.. For D-FPAV protocol, the delay limit is below 100 ms for high vehicular density but for sparse scenario, this value surpasses the delay bound limit of 100 ms required for most of the safety applications [8]. DMMAC protocol performs much better than the previously discussed protocols and confines its delay limit much below 100 ms for all vehicular densities and transmission ranges.…”
Section: Protocols Comparedmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…67 • PDR: It is defined as the ratio of data packets received to the total original packet generated by vehicles. 68 • Packet loss: The packet loss happens when the packet does not reach its destination and denotes the ratio of lost packets overall the transmitted packets. 69,70 • Scalability: The VANETs could be a large-scale network.…”
Section: Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%