2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-020-00735-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mediolateral damping of an overhead body weight support system assists stability during treadmill walking

Abstract: Background: Body weight support systems with three or more degrees of freedom (3-DoF) are permissive and safe environments that provide unloading and allow unrestricted movement in any direction. This enables training of walking and balance control at an early stage in rehabilitation. Transparent systems generate a support force vector that is near vertical at all positions in the workspace to only minimally interfere with natural movement patterns. Patients with impaired balance, however, may benefit from add… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(140 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The times of heel strike (HS) and toe off were calculated from the zero-crossing of heel and toe marker velocity ( Zeni et al, 2008 ). Approximated center of mass (CoM) was defined as the midpoint between left posterior spina iliac to right anterior spina iliac and left anterior spina iliac to right posterior spina iliac ( Havens et al, 2018 ; Bannwart et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The times of heel strike (HS) and toe off were calculated from the zero-crossing of heel and toe marker velocity ( Zeni et al, 2008 ). Approximated center of mass (CoM) was defined as the midpoint between left posterior spina iliac to right anterior spina iliac and left anterior spina iliac to right posterior spina iliac ( Havens et al, 2018 ; Bannwart et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time of HS and TO were calculated by zero crossing in heel and toe marker velocity, respectively [ 26 ]. An approximated CoM was calculated by taking the midpoint between left posterior spina iliac to right anterior spina iliac and left anterior spina iliac to right posterior spina iliac [ 27 , 28 ]. We did not use the full-body marker set and segment weights for CoM calculation because the harness prevented reliable placement of the torso markers, and the approximated CoM model is well understood in its limitations [ 27 , 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preregistration of protocols and outcome measures was present in three studies [ 54 56 ]. Original data was made publicly available in seven studies [ 16 , 54 , 56 60 ], whereas seven studies mentioned data to be readily available upon request [ 61 67 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the included papers, eight involved trunk manipulation, describing five interventions. In non-impaired subjects, the most frequently used intervention was conventional body weight support (T1), which showed limited evidence for the improvement of gait stability [ 59 , 61 , 69 71 ]. Indicative evidence was provided in a single study applying both body weight support (BWS) and medio-lateral (ML) damping (T2) [ 61 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation