2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpsp.2012.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medidas sumário física e mental de estado de saúde para a população portuguesa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
23

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
35
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…p \ 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Total score and mental and physical components summaries of SF-36 were calculated according to Ferreira et al [20] methodology. It included a Z-score transformation for each dimension, followed by an arithmetic component (*10 ?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…p \ 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. Total score and mental and physical components summaries of SF-36 were calculated according to Ferreira et al [20] methodology. It included a Z-score transformation for each dimension, followed by an arithmetic component (*10 ?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scores of the mental component summary (MCS) and the PCS were derived from the eight different domains, originally developed for the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The domains included in PCS are physical functioning, role-physical, pain and general health, and in MCS are vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health [19,20]. Total score was also calculated and includes the eight domains of SF-36 questionnaire.…”
Section: Kidney Disease Quality Of Life Questionnaire-short Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the significance of a chi-square test is dependent on the number of participants, other goodness-of-fit indexes were also used. Chi square/degree of freedom ratio (CMIN/DF) (<.5); goodness-of-fit statistic (GFI) and comparative fit index (CFI) and AGFI (>0.95 suggesting good fit), and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) (>0.05 suggesting good fit) [23,24]. Based on multivariate Lagrange Multiplier (LM) tests, post-hoc modifications to the proposed model were made to add new paths as necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mental and physical component summaries of SF-36 were calculated according to Ferreira et al methodology (Ferreira et al, 2012). It included a Z-score transformation for each dimension, followed by an arithmetic component (*10 þ 50), added after the sum of the Z-transformed corresponding dimensions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%