Medidas de proteção na promoção de alimentação saudável: uma revisão de literatura

Abstract

Publicidade de alimentos, Sódio, Ácidos graxos trans, Alimentos industrializados.

Percepção da qualidade alimentar entre os usuários de uma clínica-escola no interior da Bahia, Brasil

“…O plano de fundo do desenvolvimento de tais hábitos alimentares é, como ressaltam diversos autores, um processo mais amplo de mudanças socioculturais e econômicas que provoca a diluição dos vínculos culturais e afetivos com as referências baseadas na tradição de natureza familiar e/ou na coletividade local (CANESQUI e GARCIA, 2005;LEITE, 2007;FONSECA et al, 2009). Tem-se, portanto, o desenho da trajetória de uma desvinculação dos marcos culturais transmitidos por gerações e uma rápida incorporação de novos padrões alimentares -entre outros -fixados pelos mass media, pelo sistema produtivo industrial, por novos ritmos baseados no trabalho assalariado e por novos estilos de vida (TEIXEIRA et al, 2012;RUCKERT e GAIA, 2014;KLIEMANN et al, 2016).…”

Marketing of food and beverage in Brazil: scientific literature review on regulation and self-regulation of advertisements

“…Significant part of literature reviewed suggests that there is direct responsibility of food and beverage industry regarding serious ethical transgressions in advertisement [35][36][37]40,45,47,50,54,57,58,61 , especially directed towards children 46,48,52,53,55,56,59,60 . Furthermore, results presented indicate high level of relapse in ethical transgressions of certain sectors of food and beverage industry referring to advertisement practices 37,42,[47][48][49][50]52,55,61 .…”

“…Concerning government regulation and/or institutional self-regulation, studies reviewed have shown general trends in favor of government regulation of food and beverage advertisement related to children and adolescents 36,39,42,53,54 , whereas the role self-regulation performed by CONAR is usually criticized 36,38,40,43,46,49,51 , especially regarding its limitations in punishment of ethical transgressions and potential bias due to conflicts of interest.…”

“…There were six studies based on literature review; none reporting systematic review of literature, and mostly referring to the role and behavior of food and beverage industry in relation to establishment of government regulation and institutional self-regulation, pointing to potential conflicts of interest due to lobby in creation of laws or bias in process of monitoring food and beverage advertisement 43,45,51,54,57,60 .…”

“…Major part of studies identified presented approach against food and beverage industry (n=19; 70.4%) [35][36][37]40,[43][44]47,[49][50][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] ; seven presented approach against CONAR monitoring (25.9%) 36,38,40,[46][47][48]51 , being three also associated with negative view of industry 36,40,47 ; five studies were favorable to government regulation (18.5%) 36,39,42,52,53 , being three also against actions of industry 36,[52][53] ; three studies (11.1%) criticized government regulation (including ANVISA's RDC 24/2010) 41,45,48 ; and two studies approached favorably CONAR monitoring (7.4%) 44,58 whilst maintaining negative view of food and beverage industry.…”