Medicolegal lessons learned from thyroidectomy-related lawsuits: an analysis of judicial precedents in South Korea from 1998 to 2019

Abstract

Background: Thyroid cancer is one of the most common cancers in South Korea, and thyroidectomy is still frequently performed. As new diagnostic methods have led to a significant increase in the early detection of thyroid cancer worldwide, medical disputes related to thyroid surgery are also likely to increase. The purpose of this study was to investigate the causes of medical disputes related to thyroidectomy and to identify ways to prevent unnecessary disputes and malpractice.Methods: We analyzed 35 judicial decisions involving thyroidectomy in South Korea from January 1998 to July 2019. Results:The most common cause of lawsuits was "performance error during surgery" (n=19), especially "recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury" (n=7), of which five cases were ruled medical malpractice. For lawsuits involving misdiagnosis (n=14), five regarding fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and frozen section examination were ruled malpractice. The most common malpractice related to informed consent was "lack of explanation about surgery complications" (n=10).Conclusions: Surgeons should follow guidelines to protect themselves from diagnostic error dispute; performing FNAC more often might also prevent lawsuits. When the courts judge the surgeon's negligence in cases of RLN injuries, whether bilateral or unilateral, it is necessary to consider fully the surgeon's efforts to prevent RLN injuries. Providing information and building trust through sufficient patient-doctor communication is crucial.

Analysis of the characteristics and risk factors affecting the judgment results of medical damage liability disputes in 3172 second-instance and retrial cases in China

“…In addition to paying attention to the duty of care and strictly complying with medical care routines, medical staff should also pay attention to notifications of surgical plans and surgical risk and the standardization of surgical records. Moreover, medical staff should follow guidelines to protect themselves from medical disputes [ 42 ].…”

Is physical restraint unethical and illegal?: a qualitative analysis of Korean written judgments

“…We clarified the purpose of the study and discussed which information to identify in written judgments [ 30 , 35 ] for the first step. Three categories were organized as elements for content analysis: basic information about the lawsuit and the case, and court’s decision.…”

“…A written judgment contains factual information about a specific dispute, the arguments of both parties (the plaintiff and defendant), and the court’s decision regarding the dispute [ 9 , 29 ]. These judgments facilitate empirical research on cases obscured by confidentiality or personal data concerns [ 30 ]. Courts’ decisions provide valuable information that can only be found within written judgments; they play a crucial role in upholding societal order and establish legal precedents that are binding in countries adhering to the common law system [ 31 ].…”

Informed Consent for Intraoperative Neural Monitoring in Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery – Consensus Statement of the International Neural Monitoring Study Group

“…Malpractice claims related to thyroid and parathyroid surgery are costly and time-consuming ( 67 ). All permanent and transient consequences of thyroid surgery constituted malpractice claims and the RLN injury or palsy is the leading cause ( 10 , 67 – 69 ). Dralle et al.…”