2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0212-6567(04)79429-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medición de la calidad de vida en niños y adolescentes: comprobación preliminar de la validez y fiabilidad de la versión española del cuestionario KINDL

Abstract: The first Spanish version of the Kindl showed acceptable reliability and validity. In spite of the punctual inadequacies found in this first step of the investigation, the results constitute an important starting point to work further on the KINDL as an HRQoL instrument--in Spanish language--to measure subjective well-being in children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The children’s HRQoL was evaluated using Revidierter KINDer Lebensqualitätsfragebogen (KINDL-R) validated for Spanish children aged 4 to 16 [ 32 ]. This questionnaire consists of 24 items associated with six dimensions of HRQoL: physical well-being (e.g., illness, pain, fatigue), emotional well-being (e.g., boredom, loneliness, scared), self-esteem (e.g., pride, feeling on top of the world), family (e.g., relationship with parents, conflicts at home), friends (e.g., getting along with others or feeling different), everyday functioning in school (e.g., enjoying classes, worrying about the future), and disease (e.g., illness uncertainty, parent overprotection, absence from school) [ 33 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The children’s HRQoL was evaluated using Revidierter KINDer Lebensqualitätsfragebogen (KINDL-R) validated for Spanish children aged 4 to 16 [ 32 ]. This questionnaire consists of 24 items associated with six dimensions of HRQoL: physical well-being (e.g., illness, pain, fatigue), emotional well-being (e.g., boredom, loneliness, scared), self-esteem (e.g., pride, feeling on top of the world), family (e.g., relationship with parents, conflicts at home), friends (e.g., getting along with others or feeling different), everyday functioning in school (e.g., enjoying classes, worrying about the future), and disease (e.g., illness uncertainty, parent overprotection, absence from school) [ 33 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total scores from the children’s questionnaires were converted to a scale of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicated better HRQoL. The reliability of this questionnaire in each dimension was measured by α Cronbach coefficient: physical well-being (0.48), emotional well-being (0.54), self-esteem (0.76), family (0.57), friends (0.54), school (0.50), and total score (0.81) [ 32 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children's HRQoL was measured using the valid and reliable RevidierterKINDer Lebensqualitätsfragebogen (KINDL-R), validated for Spanish children from 8 to 16 years old. 15 The KINDL-R assesses HRQoL through 24 questions about children's experiences during the past week. The 24 items are answered according to a Likert-type scale (1)(2)(3)(4)(5) and are equally distributed into 6 subscale scores/dimensions: physical wellbeing, emotional wellbeing, selfesteem, family, friends, and school.…”
Section: Hrqolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Escala originalmente creada en idioma alemán por Bullinger et al(1994) y revisada posteriormente por Ravens-Sieberer y Bullinger (1998), su traducción al español fue realizada por Fernández-López et al (2004) en España. El cuestionario está compuesto por 24 ítems con escala Likert de 1 nunca a 5 siempre y cinco subescalas: bienestar emocional, bienestar físico, amigos, familia, autoestima y colegio.…”
Section: Cuestionario Para Niños Y Adolescentes Kiddo-kindl (Questionunclassified
“…La versión española evidenció una buena validez factorial, extrayendo DOI: https://doi.org/10.21501/22161201.3218 un único factor para cada escala con una varianza explicada por cada factor mayor de 39%. Los niveles de confiabilidad de las subescalas estuvieron entre 0.50 y 0.84 (Fernández-López et al, 2004). Cabe anotar que la escala ha sido también validada en Chile, donde se reportaron índices de consistencia interna similares a los de la población española (Alfas de Chronbach entre 0.50 y 0.90) con una estructura factorial que explicó el 61.92% del constructo (Urzúa y Mercado, 2008).…”
Section: Cuestionario Para Niños Y Adolescentes Kiddo-kindl (Questionunclassified