2014
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006274.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medically assisted nutrition for adult palliative care patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
48
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the nutritional approach, the single reported study 24 seems to show an advantage in its use, even if the Cochrane review 5 and the available guidelines 3,26 seem to exclude a real advantage for parenteral nutrition in the refractory phase of cancer cachexia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerning the nutritional approach, the single reported study 24 seems to show an advantage in its use, even if the Cochrane review 5 and the available guidelines 3,26 seem to exclude a real advantage for parenteral nutrition in the refractory phase of cancer cachexia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 A Cochrane Systematic Review on the use of medically assisted nutrition in palliative care patients concludes that There are insufficient good quality studies to make any recommendations for practice. 5 Therefore, according to a recent position paper, 6 the decision to administer parenteral nutrition should be tailored to individual patients on a clinical basis and should be consistent with the goals of patient care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this study, the median period of hospitalization was significantly shorter for gastrostomy-fed patients than for nasogastric tube-fed patients (21 vs. 64 days). Although artificial nutrition in terminally ill cancer patients is controversial (24,25), this difference might reflect the fact that patients with a PEG tube were able to receive nutrition and medications as long as possible before hospitalization. In other words, patients without a PEG tube may have been hospitalized earlier due to malnutrition than patients with a PEG tube.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ein Cochrane Review aus dem Jahr 2014 bemängelte das Vorliegen qualitativ hochwertiger Studien, sodass bis dato keine wirkliche Praxisempfehlung ausgesprochen werden kann [22]. Eine orale Nahrungszufuhr stellt nach wie vor die physiologischste Art der Kalorienzufuhr dar, wobei zu betonen ist, dass eine künstliche Ernährung keinen tumorstimulierenden Effekt hat.…”
Section: Therapieunclassified