Medical Students’ Perceptions, Knowledge, and Competence in Treating Neurodivergent, Disability, and Chronic Illness (NDCI) Populations: Results from a Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract:Background: Globally, Neurodivergent, Disability, and Chronic Illness (NDCI) populations face significant health disparities. Lack of physician knowledge about NDCI is a key mechanism underlying these disparities. The current study aimed to describe medical students’ perceptions, knowledge, and competence regarding NDCI.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out using an online survey of medical students at a large public university with no NDCI-specific curriculum (n = 97; response rate = 18%). The sur… Show more
“…Therefore, the results of this study are not intended to judge or compare the achieved competence of participants. Instead, ratings of subjective competence are known to reflect students' confidence, attitude, and motivation 27–29 . The lack of confidence in students' self‐perceived competence to deal with a highly prevalent disorder thus raises serious concerns regarding the medical care for these patients and be a causative factor in the problems and shortcomings of medical care for IBS patients in Germany that have been documented on a large database 1,30 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, ratings of subjective competence are known to reflect students' confidence, attitude, and motivation. [27][28][29] The lack of confidence in students' self-perceived competence to deal with a highly prevalent disorder thus raises serious concerns regarding the medical care for these patients and be for IBS patients in Germany that have been documented on a large database. 1,30 Finally, the overall response rate of 13.3% achieved with this online survey is lower than rates that are seen with other surveys, especially when participants have known personal relations to the subject of the survey.…”
BackgroundNeurogastroenterological disorders (NGDs) are highly prevalent and substantially impact patients' quality of life. Effective treatment of NGDs depends on the competence and training of medical caregivers. Students' perceived competence in neurogastroenterology and its place in medical school curricula are assessed in this study.MethodsA multi‐center digital survey among medical students was conducted at five universities. Self‐ratings of competence regarding basic mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of six chronic medical conditions were assessed. These included irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), gastroesophageal reflux disease, and achalasia. Ulcerative colitis, hypertension, and migraine were included as references.Key ResultsOf 231 participants, 38% remembered that neurogastroenterology was covered in their curriculum. Highest competence ratings were stated for hypertension and the lowest for IBS. These findings were identical for all institutions irrespective of their curricular model and demographic parameters. Students who remembered neurogastroenterology as a part of their curriculum reported higher competence ratings. According to 72% of students, NGDs should be highlighted more prominently in the curriculum.Conclusions & InferencesDespite its epidemiological relevance, neurogastroenterology is only weakly represented in medical curricula. Students report low levels of subjective competence in handling NGDs. In general, assessing the learners' perspective on an empirical basis may enrichen the process of national standardization of medical school curricula.
“…Therefore, the results of this study are not intended to judge or compare the achieved competence of participants. Instead, ratings of subjective competence are known to reflect students' confidence, attitude, and motivation 27–29 . The lack of confidence in students' self‐perceived competence to deal with a highly prevalent disorder thus raises serious concerns regarding the medical care for these patients and be a causative factor in the problems and shortcomings of medical care for IBS patients in Germany that have been documented on a large database 1,30 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, ratings of subjective competence are known to reflect students' confidence, attitude, and motivation. [27][28][29] The lack of confidence in students' self-perceived competence to deal with a highly prevalent disorder thus raises serious concerns regarding the medical care for these patients and be for IBS patients in Germany that have been documented on a large database. 1,30 Finally, the overall response rate of 13.3% achieved with this online survey is lower than rates that are seen with other surveys, especially when participants have known personal relations to the subject of the survey.…”
BackgroundNeurogastroenterological disorders (NGDs) are highly prevalent and substantially impact patients' quality of life. Effective treatment of NGDs depends on the competence and training of medical caregivers. Students' perceived competence in neurogastroenterology and its place in medical school curricula are assessed in this study.MethodsA multi‐center digital survey among medical students was conducted at five universities. Self‐ratings of competence regarding basic mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of six chronic medical conditions were assessed. These included irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), gastroesophageal reflux disease, and achalasia. Ulcerative colitis, hypertension, and migraine were included as references.Key ResultsOf 231 participants, 38% remembered that neurogastroenterology was covered in their curriculum. Highest competence ratings were stated for hypertension and the lowest for IBS. These findings were identical for all institutions irrespective of their curricular model and demographic parameters. Students who remembered neurogastroenterology as a part of their curriculum reported higher competence ratings. According to 72% of students, NGDs should be highlighted more prominently in the curriculum.Conclusions & InferencesDespite its epidemiological relevance, neurogastroenterology is only weakly represented in medical curricula. Students report low levels of subjective competence in handling NGDs. In general, assessing the learners' perspective on an empirical basis may enrichen the process of national standardization of medical school curricula.
“…Adnan Mujanovic, 1 Vincent Kipkorir, 2 Cesare Mercalli, 3 Arkadeep Dhali, 4 Purva Shah, 5 Camila Velandia, 6 Ciara Egan, 7 Mihnea-Alexandru Găman, 8 Juan C. Puyana, 9 Francisco J. Bonilla-Escobar. 10 Medical education has had a dependence on the foundation of scientific evidence in order to ensure the provision of the best patient care.…”
Section: The Ijms World Conference Of Medical Student Research and An...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of them is populations belong to the Globally, Neurodivergent, Disability, and Chronic Illness (NDCI) specter. 9 A group from the University of California performed a crosssectional study to check medical students' perceptions, knowledge, and competence regarding NDCI. 1 in 10 participants reported that their medical school included the NDCI population in their curriculum, but also that most of their knowledge on this cohort comes from their personal experience and media outlets and not from academical setting.…”
Section: Mental Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They suggested that informed efforts should be undertaken to tackle disparities in the knowledge of future physicians regarding NDCI. 9 Mental health is often stigmatized when compared to its physical counterpart. Addictive diseases, with their severe impact on mental health, are no exception to this rule.…”
We introduce the first IJMS World Conference of Medical Student Research as a unique opportunity for medical students and early-career scientists around the globe to share the results of their research in an online worldwide platform, aimed at increasing accessibility to research for medical students and creating bonds of collaborations between participants and future scientists and leaders of medical research education. This is also the second issue of the 10-year anniversary of the Journal, and we describe in summary the published research and experiences of this issue.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.