Medical Students’ Perception and Perceived Value of Peer Learning in Undergraduate Clinical Skill Development and Assessment: Mixed Methods Study

Abstract

Background The effectiveness of peer learning in clinical skill development is well recognized and researched, given the many benefits gained such as enhanced learning, alleviation of the burden on faculty, and early development of teaching skills for future doctors. However, little is known in terms of its effectiveness as an assessment tool and the extent to which peer assessment can be relied upon in the absence of faculty support. Objective This study was conducted to assess medical students’ perception toward peer learning, which is based on self-regulated learning as a tool of assessment, and to compare peer evaluation with faculty evaluation of clinical skill performance. Methods A cohort of 36 third-year medical students were exposed to peer learning (same-level) in clinical skills education for 3 months. A convergent mixed methods approach was adapted to collect data from 3 sources, namely, students’ perception of peer learning, performance scores, and reflective observational analysis. A 5-point Likert-type scale was used to assess students’ (n=28) perception on the value of peer learning. The students were asked to assess their peers by using a preset checklist on clinical skill performance, and scores were compared to faculty assessment scores. Reflective observational data were collected from observing video recordings of some of the peer learning sessions. The findings from all 3 sources were integrated using joint display analysis. Results Out of 28 students, 25 students completed the survey and 20 students perceived peer learning as valuable in clinical skills education. The mean score of peer assessment was higher than that of faculty assessment. There was a significant difference in student performance between supervised teaching and peer learning groups (P=.003). Most students focused on the mastery of skill with little attention to the technique’s quality. Further, students were unable to appreciate the relevance of the potential clinical findings of physical examination. Conclusions Peer learning in clinical skills education, based on self-regulated learning, empowers students to develop a more responsible approach toward their education. However, peer assessment is insufficient to evaluate clinical skill performance in the absence of faculty support. Therefore, we recommend that peer learning activities be preceded by supervised faculty-taught sessions.

Mediation and moderation effects of motivation and teaching quality on the relationship between peer tutoring and mathematics achievement

“…The method of PT as a teaching and learning strategy is enormously effective at enlightening students' knowledge of mathematics subjects, as students perform much better, as showed by their grades, and it builds trust, allowing them to work together and share their ideas (Alzaabi et al, 2021;Bozzi et al, 2021). The findings of this study suggest that PT has a significant effect on M of high school students This is consistent with some previous studies.…”

Students’ Perception of Formative Assessment as an Instructional Tool in Competency-Based Medical Education: Proposal for a Proof-of-Concept Study

“…Self-directed learning has gained widespread recognition [ 20 ]. Medical educators have been experimenting with differing techniques to foster self-directed learning and in turn lifelong learning habits [ 18 , 21 , 22 ]. The study proposed in this protocol is likely to prove that the FAIS is effective in enhancing academic performance through fostering self-directed learning [ 23 , 24 ].…”

Assessment as Learning in Medical Education: Feasibility and Perceived Impact of Student-Generated Formative Assessments

“…This study relied on a convergent mixed methods research design [14], which is commonly used in health professions education research [15][16][17]. The strength of this multiphase research design lies in its potential to capture a holistic perspective of the subject matter.…”