2019
DOI: 10.1111/appy.12360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical students' experiences in learning the Mental State Examination with standardized patients

Abstract: Introduction: Standardized patients are widely used in psychiatry teaching and examinations, but their effectiveness in teaching psychopathology and the Mental State Examination in particular has not been established. A mixed-methods study was undertaken amongst fourth year medical students during a psychiatry rotation to explore the usefulness of learning the Mental State Examination with standardized patients compared with real patients.Methods: Qualitative semistructured interviews (N = 10) were done to exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19,20 However, findings relating to the effectiveness of many of these interventions have been inconsistent to date. 21,22 This study exhibits limitations. The survey features selfreported, rather than objective, measures of clinical confidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19,20 However, findings relating to the effectiveness of many of these interventions have been inconsistent to date. 21,22 This study exhibits limitations. The survey features selfreported, rather than objective, measures of clinical confidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“… 19 , 20 However, findings relating to the effectiveness of many of these interventions have been inconsistent to date. 21 , 22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on how SPs are perceived by students has shown mixed results: interprofessional healthcare professionals and teachers stated that exercises with SPs were associated with an increased sense of realism, and actor feedback was highlighted as a key component in learning [ 31 ]. Others have reported that medical students found interactions with SPs to be unnatural [ 32 ] or felt that actors overacted and did not behave like real patients [ 33 ], although this view was not shared by teachers [ 33 ]. In our focus groups, working with actors as SPs was generally regarded as increasing the sense of realism in the simulations, although a few experienced it as constraining and stated that the actors were too extreme and overacted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Role-play exercises[2,24,25,27,29,32,43,46,51,52,[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63]] • Directly/indirectly observed sequences with real patients in in-/outpatient settings with expert feedback in individual or group learning settings [18, 21, 28, 64-69] • Clinical rotations/attachments/clerkships [33, 34, 45, 48, 51, 52, 69, 70] • Practice with standardized interview guides or documentation templates [22, 47, 48, 71] • (Video-taped) interactions in person or virtually with real/simulated or manikin patients[23, 32-35, 46, 55, 69, 70, 72] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%