1986
DOI: 10.1097/00043764-198608000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical Screening in the Workplace: Proposed Principles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Tests used for medical monitoring should be sensitive, specific, precise, rapid, easy, inexpensive, and involve, at most, minimal risk. The positive predictive value of the test should be calculated based on the anticipated prevalence of disease in the monitored population to determine whether the costs and risks of monitoring are reasonable and whether a net benefit is anticipated to accrue to the monitored population [6]. In developing a medical monitoring program for former workers at the US Department of Energy weapons sites and national laboratories, monitoring for a "particular exposure-induced health outcome" was only considered if two criteria were met:…”
Section: Peer-reviewed Medical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tests used for medical monitoring should be sensitive, specific, precise, rapid, easy, inexpensive, and involve, at most, minimal risk. The positive predictive value of the test should be calculated based on the anticipated prevalence of disease in the monitored population to determine whether the costs and risks of monitoring are reasonable and whether a net benefit is anticipated to accrue to the monitored population [6]. In developing a medical monitoring program for former workers at the US Department of Energy weapons sites and national laboratories, monitoring for a "particular exposure-induced health outcome" was only considered if two criteria were met:…”
Section: Peer-reviewed Medical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two approaches, both designed for former US Department of Energy workers, demonstrate two diametrically opposite approaches to medical monitoring. The use of tests and test panels (e.g., liver function panel) without a scientifically sound and evidence-based rationale increases the risk that results will be abnormal due to chance alone [6]. Further investigation (e.g., invasive confirmatory testing) of these abnormal results may then lead to greater risk and increased costs.…”
Section: Peer-reviewed Medical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In occupational health, the term "screening" should be used to describe programs that include a medical history, physical examination, and laboratory tests to detect a specific disease process at an early, potentially reversible stage. 5 Efficacy of case identification surveillance programs is best described by quantification of the benefit to the individual case, his or her co-workers, or improvements in the work environment. These benefits can be considered using traditional prevention concepts.…”
Section: Areas2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precepts suggested by Wilson & Junger are presented in parallel with revised precepts for screening for the effects of occupational exposure ( Table I). A fuller treatment of these precepts can be fo und in (30).…”
Section: Precepts Fo R Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%