Medical school admission test: advantages for students whose parents are medical doctors?

Abstract

BackgroundAdmission candidates especially in medicine do not represent the socio-demographic proportions of the average population: children of parents with an academic background are highly overrepresented, and those with parents who are medical doctors represent quite a large and special group. At Göttingen University Medicine, a new admission procedure was established with the intention to broaden the base of applicants towards including candidates with previous medical training or lower final school grades. With a view to family background, we wished to know whether candidates differ in the test scores in our admission procedure.MethodsIn February 2014 we asked all admission candidates of Göttingen University Medicine by questionnaire (nine closed, four open questions) about the academic background in their families, specifically, the medical background, school exam grades, and previous medical training as well as about how they prepared for the admission test. We also analysed data from admission scores of this group (semi-structured interview and four multiple mini-interviews). In addition to descriptive statistics, we used a Pearson correlation, means comparisons (t-test, analysis of variance), ANOVA, and a Scheffé test.ResultsIn February 2014 nearly half of the applicants (44%) at Göttingen University Medicine had a medical background, most frequently, their parents were physicians. This rate is much higher than reported in the literature. Other socio-demographic baseline data did not differ from the percentages given in the literature. Of all applicants, 20% had previous medical training. The group of applicants with parents who were medical doctors did not show any advantage in either test-scoring (MMI and interview), their individual preparation for the admission test, or in receiving or accepting a place at medical school. Candidates with parents who were medical doctors had scored slightly lower in school exam grades.ConclusionOur results suggest that there is a self-selection bias as well as a pre-selection for this particular group of applicants. This effect has to be observed during future admission procedures.

An ethnography of chronic pain management in primary care: The social organization of physicians’ work in the midst of the opioid crisis

“…Evidence indicates that health care providers rarely share the same socio-economic background as such patients [34]. This is especially so for physicians, who tend overwhelmingly to be from affluent social strata [35–38]. Often these differences have been related to bias on the part of physicians [39–42], or discussed in terms of effective communication between physicians and patients [43–46].…”

Exploring sociodemographic subgroup differences in multiple mini-interview (MMI) performance based on MMI station type and the implications for the predictive fairness of the Hamburg MMI

“…In Germany, a significantly higher percentage of medical graduates has at least one parent working as a physician compared to other disciplines [33]. Simmenroth-Nayda and Görlich [34] found that candidates who had physicians in their family did not perform differently at the MMI for admission to the University of Göttingen. However, the category “family member” was not limited to close family members (e.g., parents) but also included distant family members (e.g., uncles/aunts, grandparents, etc.).…”

Motivation of Dutch high school students from various backgrounds for applying to study medicine: a qualitative study

“…1 Debates increasingly focus on the disadvantage of under-represented socio-demographic groups due to the use of selection processes to decide who gets admitted to medical programmes. Under-representation of ethnic minority students, 2 3 students without a medical family background, 4–6 students who are the first in their family to go to a university, 5 7 8 lower socioeconomic status (SES) students 3 5 9 and males 9 10 in the medical student population can, to some extent, be ascribed to biased selection processes. 11–24 However, under-representation is not always due to a bias in selection processes 4 6 14 16 21 25–27 and widening-access efforts targeting selection bias have been till date only moderately successful in resolving disparities.…”