2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical savings accounts in Singapore: how much is adequate?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twenty percent of older males and 33% of older females do not have retirement accounts or pension schemes (Phua 2001), and 50.9% of elderly above 65 have less than $5,000 in their CPF accounts (Teo et al 2006). Further, personal savings accounts that would count towards medical expenses are insufficient for more than half the Singaporeans who will retire at age 62 (Chia and Tsui 2005). Government Public Assistance (PA) has a stringent means test and only the very poorest people are eligible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty percent of older males and 33% of older females do not have retirement accounts or pension schemes (Phua 2001), and 50.9% of elderly above 65 have less than $5,000 in their CPF accounts (Teo et al 2006). Further, personal savings accounts that would count towards medical expenses are insufficient for more than half the Singaporeans who will retire at age 62 (Chia and Tsui 2005). Government Public Assistance (PA) has a stringent means test and only the very poorest people are eligible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If MSAs are to be adopted, it will also be important to foster an economic and regulatory environment that is conducive to market-oriented plans. Prerequisites for the viability and sustainability of MSAs include a high income per capita, a national culture of saving and personal responsibility for health, and a well-functioning and transparent regulatory environment, both in the health sector and in the financial services sector (Nichols et al , 1997; Chia and Tsui, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major reforms of health care financing were implemented with the introduction of the National Health Plan in 1983, the Compulsory Savings Scheme (Medisave) in 1984, Catastrophic Illness Insurance (MediShield) in 1990, and a means-tested Medical Endowment Fund (Medifund) in 1993, to protect those unable to pay their medical expenses. The Central Provident Fund Act 1953 is the legislative basis for the Medisave, MediShield, and Medifund, or the so-called '3Ms' of the Singaporean integrated system of compulsory saving accounts (Chia and Tsui 2005). Currently, contributions to the Central Provident Fund amount to 36 per cent of gross salary, shared between the employee and the employer (6-8 per cent is contributed to the Medisave accounts).…”
Section: Singaporementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors conclude that minor changes to the existing system will not be sufficient to meet health care financing objectives. Chia and Tsui (2005) studied the adequacy of medical savings accounts in Singapore in covering lifetime health care expenditure of retirees aged 62 and above, categorised by gender and income group. They found that the required minimum balance of S$25,000 is adequate for less well-off members under a range of assumptions about medical technology growth and future interest rates.…”
Section: Singaporementioning
confidence: 99%