2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical record bias in documentation of obstetric and neonatal clinical quality of care indicators in Uganda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether the differences identified in adjusted coverage estimates are meaningful enough to increase the frequency of measurement depends on the acceptable degree of error (measurement as well as sampling) for a given application; they should certainly be considered when reporting any adjusted coverage analyses. Direct observation is a powerful method of assessing quality with clear benefits relative to routine indicators or record review [ 49 ], but its use for assessing sick child services requires further consideration to determine if this measure can provide reliable information within any timeframe with current sample sizes. Targeting direct observation appropriately and deploying it strategically would enhance the value of this approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether the differences identified in adjusted coverage estimates are meaningful enough to increase the frequency of measurement depends on the acceptable degree of error (measurement as well as sampling) for a given application; they should certainly be considered when reporting any adjusted coverage analyses. Direct observation is a powerful method of assessing quality with clear benefits relative to routine indicators or record review [ 49 ], but its use for assessing sick child services requires further consideration to determine if this measure can provide reliable information within any timeframe with current sample sizes. Targeting direct observation appropriately and deploying it strategically would enhance the value of this approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the quality of service in the SPA data set used for the current study was measured by direct observation, which is the most reliable method for assessing quality. Direct observation has been conclusively shown to be superior to routine indicators or record reviews [ 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%