2013
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e17570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical oncologists’ clinical experiences and comfort levels with 20 recently approved agents.

Abstract: e17570 Background: The rapid pace of current oncology drug development has provided medical oncologists (MO) and patients with many additional treatment options, but minimal publicly accessible information exists on how new agents are incorporated into practice. Methods: From 12/15/2012 to 1/21/2013,100 US-based MO were recruited to complete a survey assessing the diseases they treat and their prescribing experiences with 20 oncologic drugs approved between 9/2009 and 11/2012. MO who manage related cancers we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a paucity of information available to oncologists regarding the incorporation of newly approved agents into clinical practice, including their potential AEs. A survey of medical oncologists, assessing their clinical experiences and comfort levels with 20 recently approved targeted agents in the USA, showed that 14% had prescribed cabozantinib for MTC, and that only 11% felt very confident about prescribing the medication . This is in contrast to vandetanib, which was prescribed by 30% of the oncologists for MTC, with 16% feeling comfortable prescribing the drug.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a paucity of information available to oncologists regarding the incorporation of newly approved agents into clinical practice, including their potential AEs. A survey of medical oncologists, assessing their clinical experiences and comfort levels with 20 recently approved targeted agents in the USA, showed that 14% had prescribed cabozantinib for MTC, and that only 11% felt very confident about prescribing the medication . This is in contrast to vandetanib, which was prescribed by 30% of the oncologists for MTC, with 16% feeling comfortable prescribing the drug.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite inducing durable responses with manageable toxicity in patients with PTCL, many oncologists are not aware of the role of romidepsin in the PTCL treatment paradigm. In a survey of 100 U.S.-based medical oncologists that assessed prescribing experiences with newer oncologic drugs, only 31% were very confident about prescribing romidepsin for T-cell Perform at baseline and consider periodic monitoring in patients with congenital QT prolongation or a history of significant cardiovascular disease and in patients taking drugs that can significantly prolong QT lymphoma [81]. In addition to the agents approved for treatment of PTCL (romidepsin, belinostat, pralatrexate, and brentuximab vedotin for the ALCL subtype), NCCN treatment guidelines for nearly all subtypes (ALK-positive ALCL being the exception) recommend that patients be considered for inclusion in clinical trials [10,29,31,32].…”
Section: Role Of Expert Hematopathologists and Specialty Treatment Cementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since ALK inhibitors will be used by a multidisciplinary team in a specific subgroup of patients, physicians are likely to have limited experience in their use. 1 It is therefore essential that physicians and caregivers are aware of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in order to optimise their management and thus enhance the patient's quality of life. This article will focus on the management of AEs in ALK-positive NSCLC receiving targeted therapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%