Medical leadership, a systematic narrative review: do hospitals and healthcare organisations perform better when led by doctors?

Abstract

IntroductionDespite common assumptions that doctors are well placed to lead hospitals and healthcare organisations, the peer-reviewed literature contains little evidence on the performance of doctors in leadership roles in comparison with that of non-medical managers.ObjectivesTo determine whether there is an association between the leader’s medical background and management performance in terms of organisational performance or patient outcomes.MethodsWe searched for peer-reviewed, English language studies using Medline, Embase and Emerald Management between 2005 and 2017. We included quantitative, qualitative and mixed method empirical studies on the performance of senior healthcare managers where participants were described as doctors or leaders and where comparative performance data were provided on non-medical leaders. Studies without full text available, or no organisational, leadership behaviour or patient measures, were excluded.ResultsThe search, conducted in Medline (n=3395), Embase (n=1913) and Emerald Management (n=454) databases, yielded 3926 entries. After the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 16 studies remained. Twelve studies found that there were positive differences between medical and non-medical leaders, and eight studies correlated those findings with hospital performance or patient outcomes. Six studies examined the composition of boards of directors; otherwise, there were few common areas of investigation. Five inter-related themes emerged from a narrative analysis: the impact of medical leadership on outcomes; doctors on boards; contribution of qualifications and experience; the medical leader as an individual or part of a team and doctors transitioning into the medical leadership role.Discussion and conclusionA modest body of evidence supports the importance of including doctors on organisational governing boards. Despite many published articles on the topic of whether hospitals and healthcare organisations perform better when led by doctors, there were few empirical studies that directly compared the performance of medical and non-medical managers. This is an under-researched area that requires further funding and focus.

The association of leadership styles and nurses well-being: a cross-sectional study in healthcare settings

“…Managers should encourage the idea of life-work balance not work-life balance (i.e. life is first) [ 38 ], and should adopt a more multidisciplinary approach to be effective leaders [ 39 ]. As reported by Aboshaiqah et al .…”

Is postgraduate leadership education a match for the wicked problems of health systems leadership? A critical systematic review

“…It is in this environment that there is growing contention for physician engagement in health systems leadership given their influence over healthcare quality and resource utilization [ 6 – 9 ]. Indeed, there is modest, albeit mixed, empirical evidence to support a positive link between having physicians leaders in senior, structural roles, and indicators of health system effectiveness such as quality of care [ 10 ]. At the same time, evidence on physician leadership in practice suggests that health systems leadership work is fraught with challenges and paradoxical tensions.…”

Survey of the understanding and interest in the chief registrar scheme from doctors in an area of low uptake

“…There is emerging evidence that clinicians undertaking senior leadership roles within a trust are associated with better quality of care. 3,4 Free text responses also highlighted many accurate components of the role including quality improvement and leadership, albeit with a few more benign misconceptions such as 'General Medical Council (GMC)', 'spokesperson' and 'teaching'. This suggests that although a core understanding of the role is held by many, there are still significant misconceptions to dispel.…”