2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24844-6_165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical Knowledge Representation in Terms of IF-THEN Rules and the Dempster-Shafer Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it receives some criticism concerning the computational complexity that generates for large sets of hypotheses (Clark 1990). Despite these shortcomings, Dempster-Shaffer Theory has been used efficiently for the representation of medical knowledge and uncertainty in some critical areas (Straszecka 2004).…”
Section: Reasoning Under Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it receives some criticism concerning the computational complexity that generates for large sets of hypotheses (Clark 1990). Despite these shortcomings, Dempster-Shaffer Theory has been used efficiently for the representation of medical knowledge and uncertainty in some critical areas (Straszecka 2004).…”
Section: Reasoning Under Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of hybridization is generally accepted in medical settings, since easily usable and understandable also by a non-technical audience [16,32]. As a result, applying the patterns defined in the previous section within a hybrid KB, made of if-then rules built on the top of ontological vocabularies, has appeared the more suitable solution to simplify the formalization of a very complex kind of knowledge, such as the medical one.…”
Section: Pattern Instantiation Within Hybrid Knowledge Basesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…the structure of the domain knowledge) in form of ontology-based models, whereas procedural knowledge (i.e. the knowledge about the decision making process) as a set of if-then rules built on the top of such models, according to the awareness that the combination of more representation techniques frequently perform better than the individual ones (Arguello Casteleiro et al, 2009;Kong et al, 2008;Straszecka, 2004;Ting et al, 2011).…”
Section: Background On Light-weight Knowledge Representation and Reasmentioning
confidence: 99%