2022
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2161/1/012017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical diagnosis of COVID-19 using blood tests and machine learning

Abstract: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2), colloquially known as Coronavirus surfaced in late 2019 and is an extremely dangerous disease. RT-PCR (Reverse transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction) tests are extensively used in COVID-19 diagnosis. However, they are prone to a lot of false negatives and erroneous results. Hence, alternate methods are being researched and discovered for the detection of this infectious disease. We diagnose and forecast COVID-19 with the help of routine blood tests… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For further evaluation of our proposed ensemble learning-based method, we benchmarked the results of our models with previous studies using the same datasets and the same performance metrics. The proposed model shows a significant improvement compared to the existing study using state-of-the-art methods [ 27 , 66 , 67 , 68 ] that applied a hybrid fuzzy interference engine and DNN, and a similar study by Brinati et al [ 27 ], which uses a three-way random forest classifier in the prediction of COVID-19 using the RT-PCR dataset. In another study, Chadaga et al [ 68 ] used SMOTE for oversampling, and then evaluated four machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, Logistic Regression, KNN, and Xgboost), while their hyperparameters were optimized using grid search.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For further evaluation of our proposed ensemble learning-based method, we benchmarked the results of our models with previous studies using the same datasets and the same performance metrics. The proposed model shows a significant improvement compared to the existing study using state-of-the-art methods [ 27 , 66 , 67 , 68 ] that applied a hybrid fuzzy interference engine and DNN, and a similar study by Brinati et al [ 27 ], which uses a three-way random forest classifier in the prediction of COVID-19 using the RT-PCR dataset. In another study, Chadaga et al [ 68 ] used SMOTE for oversampling, and then evaluated four machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, Logistic Regression, KNN, and Xgboost), while their hyperparameters were optimized using grid search.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The proposed model shows a significant improvement compared to the existing study using state-of-the-art methods [ 27 , 66 , 67 , 68 ] that applied a hybrid fuzzy interference engine and DNN, and a similar study by Brinati et al [ 27 ], which uses a three-way random forest classifier in the prediction of COVID-19 using the RT-PCR dataset. In another study, Chadaga et al [ 68 ] used SMOTE for oversampling, and then evaluated four machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, Logistic Regression, KNN, and Xgboost), while their hyperparameters were optimized using grid search. The best result in terms of accuracy was the 92% achieved with the Random Forest classifier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations