Medical decision-making in children and adolescents: developmental and neuroscientific aspects

Abstract

BackgroundVarious international laws and guidelines stress the importance of respecting the developing autonomy of children and involving minors in decision-making regarding treatment and research participation. However, no universal agreement exists as to at what age minors should be deemed decision-making competent. Minors of the same age may show different levels of maturity. In addition, patients deemed rational conversation-partners as a child can suddenly become noncompliant as an adolescent. Age, context and development all play a role in decision-making competence. In this article we adopt a perspective on competence that specifically focuses on the impact of brain development on the child’s decision-making process.Main bodyWe believe that the discussion on decision-making competence of minors can greatly benefit from a multidisciplinary approach. We adopted such an approach in order to contribute to the understanding on how to deal with children in decision-making situations. Evidence emerging from neuroscience research concerning the developing brain structures in minors is combined with insights from various other fields, such as psychology, decision-making science and ethics. Four capacities have been described that are required for (medical) decision-making: (1) communicating a choice; (2) understanding; (3) reasoning; and (4) appreciation. Each capacity is related to a number of specific skills and abilities that need to be sufficiently developed to support the capacity. Based on this approach it can be concluded that at the age of 12 children can have the capacity to be decision-making competent. However, this age coincides with the onset of adolescence. Early development of the brain’s reward system combined with late development of the control system diminishes decision-making competence in adolescents in specific contexts. We conclude that even adolescents possessing capacities required for decision-making, may need support of facilitating environmental factors.ConclusionThis paper intends to offer insight in neuroscientific mechanisms underlying the medical decision-making capacities in minors and to stimulate practices for optimal involvement of minors. Developing minors become increasingly capable of decision-making, but the neurobiological development in adolescence affects competence in specific contexts. Adequate support should be offered in order to create a context in which minors can make competently make decisions.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12887-017-0869-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Neuroethics of neuromodulation: An update

“…Croarkin et al note the difficulty in recruiting youth in neuromodulation studies and the lack of translational studies, resulting in little data about appropriate dosing [48]. Furthermore, some studies suggest that by age 12 children may have decision-making capacity for medical interventions and research participation and that they should play a more prominent role in these complicated decisions[52] [53]. …”

The impact of oral health literacy and family cohesion on dental caries in early adolescence

“…Early adolescence is therefore a strategic phase for the implementation of preventive oral health actions. This is a dynamic period of development involving greater autonomy in health decisions and transformations in the perception of oral health …”

“…Moreover, studies of this nature involving children have used the OHL of parents/guardians (proxy measure) . As early adolescence is a period in which individuals gain greater autonomy, it is important to consider the level of OHL among early adolescents and how it influences the development of dental caries.…”

Decisional conflict among adolescents and parents making decisions about genomic sequencing results

“…Research indicates that adolescents and adults have similar decision-making capacities when providers have clearly detailed the costs and benefits about each possible decision. 23,24 Thus, adolescents' right to be engaged in medical decision-making, including clinical genomic testing is increasingly recognized. In addition to clinical settings, adolescents may be involved in decisions about learning genomic results through direct-to-consumer genetic testing 25 companies and large research studies such as the "All of Us" Research Program, which is currently developing protocols to allow the enrollment of adolescents.…”