2019
DOI: 10.1353/bhm.2019.0029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical Compromise and Its Limits: Religious Concerns and the Postmortem Caesarean Section in Nineteenth-Century Belgium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, as recent research on the Belgian case has shown, doctors who identified as Liberals were often ready to integrate Catholic rituals into their medical practice, such as performing an intrauterine baptism in cases of difficult birth. 28 It was not until the end of the nineteenth century that things changed and positions on both sides of the ideological spectrum hardened. A transnational revitalisation of Catholic devotion and sociability took place and the culture wars (public tensions on the place of religion in a modern polity) inspired Catholics to mobilise, often around a papalist agenda.…”
Section: Doctorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, as recent research on the Belgian case has shown, doctors who identified as Liberals were often ready to integrate Catholic rituals into their medical practice, such as performing an intrauterine baptism in cases of difficult birth. 28 It was not until the end of the nineteenth century that things changed and positions on both sides of the ideological spectrum hardened. A transnational revitalisation of Catholic devotion and sociability took place and the culture wars (public tensions on the place of religion in a modern polity) inspired Catholics to mobilise, often around a papalist agenda.…”
Section: Doctorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our text-mining operations in AntConc have helped to identify large debates about difficult births in the 1840s and 1850s. These debates focused on procedures to baptize the unborn in the uterus on the one hand, and on the morality of obstetric interventions ending in the death of the fetus on the other hand (Gijbels 2019;Gijbels 2020). Central to the latter discussion was the question of whether or not physicians could give priority to the life of a woman when it was impossible to save both her life and the life of her unborn child.…”
Section: Chronology Of Ideological Vocabularymentioning
confidence: 99%