2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40746-020-00198-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medical and Invasive Management of Congenital and Acquired Pulmonary Vein Stenosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Degree of stenosis or atresia for each individual vein was defined by our previously described PVS grading scheme (Figure 1). 16 Grade 1 pulmonary veins were considered mildly stenotic with narrowest measurement >50% of the distal vein diameter. Grade 2 pulmonary veins are defined as PVS with a narrowest diameter measurement of <50% when compared with the distal vein caliber.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Degree of stenosis or atresia for each individual vein was defined by our previously described PVS grading scheme (Figure 1). 16 Grade 1 pulmonary veins were considered mildly stenotic with narrowest measurement >50% of the distal vein diameter. Grade 2 pulmonary veins are defined as PVS with a narrowest diameter measurement of <50% when compared with the distal vein caliber.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with CTA, angiographic scoring systems have been developed to characterize the severity of disease in each pulmonary vein. 10,40 The baseline vein score and involved vessel location were shown to correlate with vein outcome in a study evaluating the use of imatinib mesylate in a cohort of patients with multivessel PVS. 10 Further, Patel et al 40 have developed a thoughtful PVS scoring system to standardize the language for describing PVS.…”
Section: Angiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based upon our review of prior studies, we felt strongly that immunomodulatory therapy would be a critical component to our PVS Program. We also sought to make uniform the follow-up, surveillance imaging, and reintervention necessary to improve survival for this at-risk cohort [9,10].…”
Section: Pvs Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For patients whose worst PVs are grade 2 (>50% stenosis), repeat intervention is planned for 6-12 weeks from intervention. Timing of repeat intervention and surveillance catheterization is based upon the interval CTA, the patient's clinical appearance, and the RV pressure estimated by echocardiography [10]. We have previously reported a treatment algorithm used at our institution [24].…”
Section: Anatomic Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%