Medicaid coverage accuracy in electronic health records

Abstract

Health insurance coverage facilitates access to preventive screenings and other essential health care services, and is linked to improved health outcomes; therefore, it is critical to understand how well coverage information is documented in the electronic health record (EHR) and which characteristics are associated with accurate documentation. Our objective was to evaluate the validity of EHR data for monitoring longitudinal Medicaid coverage and assess variation by patient demographics, visit types, and clinic characteristics. We conducted a retrospective, observational study comparing Medicaid status agreement between Oregon community health center EHR data linked at the patient-level to Medicaid enrollment data (gold standard). We included adult patients with a Medicaid identification number and ≥1 clinic visit between 1/1/2013–12/31/2014 [>1 million visits (n = 135,514 patients)]. We estimated statistical correspondence between EHR and Medicaid data at each visit (visit-level) and for different insurance cohorts over time (patient-level). Data were collected in 2016 and analyzed 2017–2018. We observed excellent agreement between EHR and Medicaid data for health insurance information: kappa (>0.80), sensitivity (>0.80), and specificity (>0.85). Several characteristics were associated with agreement; at the visit-level, agreement was lower for patients who preferred a non-English language and for visits missing income information. At the patient-level, agreement was lower for black patients and higher for older patients seen in primary care community health centers. Community health center EHR data are a valid source of Medicaid coverage information. Agreement varied with several characteristics, something researchers and clinic staff should consider when using health insurance information from EHR data.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Cancer Screening: Challenges and Opportunities

“…Without key information from insurance payers, health care practitioners may lack the necessary data needed to identify those who need cancer screening [ 27 , 51 ]. Though many health care practitioners have access to electronic health record systems, information stored in these systems is often too outdated and inaccurate to be utilized [ 51 , 52 ]. This suggests that limited data may also hamper health practitioners’ ability to help patients.…”

Following Uninsured Patients Through Medicaid Expansion: Ambulatory Care Use and Diagnosed Conditions

“…Because these data are used for billing purposes, they represent reliable information on insurance status and services received at each visit. 15 The mutually exclusive post-ACA insurance coverage groups 16 included the following:…”

Effectiveness of an insurance enrollment support tool on insurance rates and cancer prevention in community health centers: a quasi-experimental study

“…EHR data contain information on payor types as well as billable codes for services performed at each ambulatory care visit; as these data are used for billing purposes, they represent reliable information on insurance status and services received at each visit [ 46 ]. For the primary outcome of insurance status, we considered separate monthly insurance rates (including Medicaid, private, other public, and uninsured).…”