2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00425-019-03300-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medicago truncatula root developmental changes by growth-promoting microbes isolated from Fabaceae, growing on organic farms, involve cell cycle changes and WOX5 gene expression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microalgae application could be expected to directly impact shoot and root elongation since eukaryotic green microalgae produce auxins and cytokinins. Our results are consistent with what has been reported on auxin producing microorganisms such as bacteria and endophytic fungi, which were found to promote plant growth [18,[70][71][72][85][86][87][88]. The difference observed in the different algae treatments could be attributed to the ratios of auxins/cytokinins or different concentrations of specific phytohormones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microalgae application could be expected to directly impact shoot and root elongation since eukaryotic green microalgae produce auxins and cytokinins. Our results are consistent with what has been reported on auxin producing microorganisms such as bacteria and endophytic fungi, which were found to promote plant growth [18,[70][71][72][85][86][87][88]. The difference observed in the different algae treatments could be attributed to the ratios of auxins/cytokinins or different concentrations of specific phytohormones.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The vast majority of studies of growth promotion in M. truncatula and its relatives such as M. sativa concentrate on the effects of growth-promoting bacteria [18,[70][71][72]. These studies especially focus on the mechanisms of these microorganisms in root development and nodulation but pay little attention to the plant architecture and leaf morphology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paenibacillus has also been reported as a nodule endophyte in L. albus [ 87 ]. Bacteria isolated from L. luteus and L. angustifolius have been reported to cluster with strains in the genera Rahnella, Serratia, Raoultella, and Stenotrophomonas [ 88 ]. Most of the endophytes isolated from L. mutabilis nodules belong to the family Bacillaceae [ 89 ].…”
Section: Rhizobia That Nodulate Lupins Many More Than Initially Expectedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We had previously identified, and registered in GenBank, 33 PGPR strains including Pseudomonas fluorescens (Ms9N) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (Ll4) from the rhizosphere and nodules of alfalfa, barrel medic ( Medicago truncatula ), bean and lupin. We characterized them and showed their growth-promoting effect on Medicago truncatula (Kisiel and Kępczyńska 2016 ; Kępczyńska and Karczyński 2020 ). To our knowledge, effects of these bacteria on in vitro growth of soil-borne Fusarium fungi have not been investigated yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, identification of any new potential rhizobacterial isolate and understanding its direct and indirect biocontrol activity is a contribution to sustainable agriculture (Meena et al 2020 ). Here, we broaden the understanding of the molecular roots-to-leaves response in M. truncatula as a consequence of soil treatment with suspensions of Pseudomonas fluorescens (Ms9N) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (Ll4); both PGPR bacteria are capable of producing siderophores, but only Ll4 have chitinase activity (Kępczyńska and Karczyński 2020 ) . Thus, the present study was aimed at (i) finding out whether the two M. truncatula PGPB identified earlier, namely Pseudomonas fluorescens (Ms9N) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (Ll4) are capable of directly controlling the mycelial growth of three legume soil-borne fungi: Fusarium culmorum Cul-3, F. oxysporum 857 and F. oxysporum f. sp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%