2018
DOI: 10.1017/s003329171800346x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mediators of increased self-harm and suicidal ideation in sexual minority youth: a longitudinal study

Abstract: BackgroundSexual minority youth have elevated suicidal ideation and self-harm compared with heterosexual young people; however, evidence for mediating mechanisms is predominantly cross-sectional. Using a longitudinal design, we investigated self-esteem and depressive symptoms as mediators of increased rates of suicidal ideation or self-harm (SISH) among sexual minority youth, and the roles of childhood gender nonconformity (CGN) and sex as moderators of these relationships.MethodIn total, 4274 youth from the A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(71 reference statements)
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The heritability estimates for sexual orientation indicators in female participants were comparable to those from previous studies (Bailey et al, 2016 ), but higher than those of male participants in the present study. This difference may be due to the better spread across the different categories of sexual orientation indicators in female compared to male participants in the present study (see Table S1, Supplementary materials), as has been previously reported (Oginni et al, 2019 ). This may have increased the power to estimate heritability in female relative to male participants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The heritability estimates for sexual orientation indicators in female participants were comparable to those from previous studies (Bailey et al, 2016 ), but higher than those of male participants in the present study. This difference may be due to the better spread across the different categories of sexual orientation indicators in female compared to male participants in the present study (see Table S1, Supplementary materials), as has been previously reported (Oginni et al, 2019 ). This may have increased the power to estimate heritability in female relative to male participants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Similarly, analyses of longitudinal data indicate that sexual minority status is associated with higher rates of later mental health problems. For example, Oginni, Robinson, Jones, Rahman, and Rimes ( 2019 ) showed that despite adjusting for depressive symptoms at 12 years, adolescents who identified as non-heterosexual at 15 years still reported significantly higher rates of depressive symptoms at 18 years. Finally, findings from a longitudinal study in a general population provided stronger evidence for mental health problems being associated with later risky sexual behavior (Ramrakha et al, 2007 ) with a reduced likelihood of reverse causation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, direct associations between CGN and anxiety disorders without prior adjustment for sexual orientation were not reported. The other (Oginni, Robinson, Jones, Rahman, & Rimes, ) found CGN was significantly correlated with depression at 18 years and with suicidal injury/self‐harm at 16. However, these outcomes focused on late adolescence and this study did not report these correlations separately for males and females.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Participants who responded either not sure or not attracted to either sex were excluded from the analyses. Due to small subgroup sizes, and in line with previous studies using the ALSPAC cohort (Jones, Robinson, Oginni, Rahman, & Rimes, 2017; Oginni, Robinson, Jones, Rahman, & Rimes, 2019; Pesola, Shelton, & van den Bree, 2014), mostly heterosexual , bisexual , and mostly homosexual responses were combined to define the sexual minority group ( n = 574), while the 100% heterosexual responses defined the heterosexual group ( n = 4470).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%