2020
DOI: 10.1353/sor.2020.0059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mediations of Outrage: How Violence Against Protestors is Remembered

Ann Rigney
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…She transmits her memories of the disappearance of her husband yet again to those who ‘did not live the violence firsthand’ (Taylor, 2003: 165). She helps to bring this all but ‘occluded history (of Prageeth’s disappearance) out of the archive into (our) working memory’ (Rigney, 2020: 709 citing Assmann, 1999). Thus, in contexts of state atrocity marked by impunity, memory activism may not remain static but evolve according to the responses they elicit and broader political and cultural dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She transmits her memories of the disappearance of her husband yet again to those who ‘did not live the violence firsthand’ (Taylor, 2003: 165). She helps to bring this all but ‘occluded history (of Prageeth’s disappearance) out of the archive into (our) working memory’ (Rigney, 2020: 709 citing Assmann, 1999). Thus, in contexts of state atrocity marked by impunity, memory activism may not remain static but evolve according to the responses they elicit and broader political and cultural dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amid this collective flow, there is one point when the camera zooms in on two individuals, an injured and bleeding young man being cradled in the arms of a friend, apparently dying before our eyes. This moment of zooming in gives a face to the memory of protest, making it ‘concrete, condensed, portable’ (Rigney, 2020: 720). In its portrayal of immediacy, urgency, collective terror and individual suffering, the footage of Santa Cruz produces a powerful affect which, at the time of its reception by western audiences, was experienced as the ‘shock of catastrophe’ (McCosker, 2004: 74).…”
Section: The Santa Cruz Massacre: Travelling Out Into the Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adding to this shock was the fact that this was footage of a civic massacre of unarmed civilians. Civic massacres, suggests Rigney (2020: 717–718), are ‘highly memorable’ because they present a powerful opposition between good and evil, ‘capturing in a condensed form the opposition between rights and might, between the rights of citizens to make their voice heard and the repression of that right on the part of the state’ (Rigney, 2020: 718). In the case of Santa Cruz, the contrast between ‘might and right’ is made vividly real due to the heartrending depiction of the youth of the victims.…”
Section: The Santa Cruz Massacre: Travelling Out Into the Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emerging interest in the entanglements between memory, activism and social and political change is an exciting new direction in Memory Studies (Gutman, 2017; Gutman and Wüstenberg, 2023; Katriel and Reading, 2015; Rigney, 2018). Scholars have begun to make sense of the ‘memory-activism nexus’ (Rigney, 2018) by exploring the interplay between memory activism : how activists produce cultural memory that aims to challenge hegemonic narratives (Gutman, 2017; Rigney, 2018: 372; Wüstenberg, 2017), the memory of activism : ‘how earlier struggles for a better world are culturally recollected’ (Rigney, 2020: 708; see also Katriel and Reading, 2015) and memory in activism: ‘ how the cultural memory of earlier struggles informs new movements in the present’ (Rigney, 2020: 708). These approaches offer rich lines of inquiry to guide our understanding of memory and activism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%