2002
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989x.7.4.422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.

Abstract: Mediation is said to occur when a causal effect of some variable X on an outcome Y is explained by some intervening variable M. The authors recommend that with small to moderate samples, bootstrap methods (B. Efron & R. Tibshirani, 1993) be used to assess mediation. Bootstrap tests are powerful because they detect that the sampling distribution of the mediated effect is skewed away from 0. They argue that R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny's (1986) recommendation of first testing the X → Y association for statistical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

127
7,247
18
90

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9,136 publications
(7,491 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
127
7,247
18
90
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, multiple fit indexes are reported to assess the fit of the hypothesized models to the sample data. Specifically, we report the relative chi-square index (χ 2 /df), where scores below 2 suggest a close fit and scores below 3 suggest an acceptable fit between the model and sample data (Bollen, 1989 We examined mediation by testing the significance of the indirect path using bootstrap methodology, as recommended by (Shrout and Bolger 2002). This approach consists of directly testing the indirect effect by estimating the confidence interval of the indirect effect through bootstrapping.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, multiple fit indexes are reported to assess the fit of the hypothesized models to the sample data. Specifically, we report the relative chi-square index (χ 2 /df), where scores below 2 suggest a close fit and scores below 3 suggest an acceptable fit between the model and sample data (Bollen, 1989 We examined mediation by testing the significance of the indirect path using bootstrap methodology, as recommended by (Shrout and Bolger 2002). This approach consists of directly testing the indirect effect by estimating the confidence interval of the indirect effect through bootstrapping.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined mediation by testing the significance of the indirect path using bootstrap methodology, as recommended by (Shrout and Bolger 2002). This approach consists of directly testing the indirect effect by estimating the confidence interval of the indirect effect through bootstrapping.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focused on the change in black-white and Latino-white odds ratios (ORs) across these three models to assess the direction and magnitude of influence of criminal history and socioeconomic status on the association between race-ethnicity and substance abuse treatment (44). This is similar to a traditional test of mediation (44), except, following recommendations of Shrout and Bolger (45) in the presence of small effect sizes and possible suppression effects, we ignored the requirement that there be a significant direct effect between the independent variable (race-ethnicity) and the outcome (receipt of substance abuse treatment).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirically speaking, the positive association between dysfunctional team behavior and performance (controlling for negative team affective tone) is capturing the part of dysfunctional behavior that is uncorrelated with negative affective tone. MacKinnon et al (2000) and Shrout and Bolger (2002) provide excellent descriptions of empirical suppression within the context of mediation analysis. Although the results show that nonverbal negative expressivity interacted with negative team affective tone to influence team performance, they do not directly assess the conditional indirect effects model depicted in Figure 1 (i.e., Hypothesis 4b).…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%