“…In this way, an ambiguous landscape of queer dialogue emerges (see also Attwood et al, 2017;Dobson et al, 2018), made intimate because of these ambiguities: in who stories are written and made visible for, in where and when they are posted, on when (or if) the story took place. The storymap thus allows queer visibility to be experienced across and beyond the site, we argue, as a spatial and affective vocabulary that, in its atemporality, challenges chrononormativity and unsettles the norms of public and private gaze (see, Freeman, 2010;Lee, 2016; see also Cefai and Couldry, 2019;Haber, 2019). Through cartographic visualisation, recounted memories are grounded in the real world -in places familiar and strange -rather than left entirely untethered in the reader's imaginary; and these desires live in the ever-present as an ongoing and lively digital trace.…”