Mediating Role of Firm R&D in Creating Product and Process Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Norway

Abstract

Government funding actively engages in private R&D investment to enhance firm innovation. At the same time, firms are forced to find additional sources of competitive advantage, e.g., through cooperation based on the triple- or quadruple-helix principles. This paper analyses whether government funding and cooperation based on the triple-helix and quadruple-helix principles spur firms’ product and process innovation rather directly or indirectly, taking into account the role of firms R&D. For this purpose, we collect data from the Community Innovation Survey and analyse 5045 Norwegian firms by using partial least squares structural equation modelling. Our results confirm hypotheses that public funding and both triple-helix and quadruple-helix cooperation significantly influence firms’ research and development activities. Surprisingly, on the one hand, we showed that neither public funding nor triple- and quadruple-helix cooperation affect firms’ product innovation directly. Moreover, the results show a negative influence of government funding and triple- and quadruple-helix cooperation on Norwegian firms’ product innovation. On the other hand, process innovation is influenced positively and directly by firms’ cooperation based on the triple- and quadruple-helix principles. The results of our analyses clearly show the key role of firm’s R&D, which has proven to be a mediator of the effects of public funding and triple- and quadruple-helix cooperation on the product and process innovation activities of Norwegian firms.

The role of Intellectual Property Rights in Enhancing Regional Development

“…We found that IPR does not have a significant effect in all quantile period. We firmly confirmed that it is due to the level of economic development in each period and the funding for R&D activities to undertake innovation (Prokop & Stejskal, 2019;Sein & Prokop, 2021). Additionally, we could see the variation of the effect of other variables.…”

An empirical analysis of talent policy, executive incentive, and enterprise green technological innovation based on China’s A-share listed companies

“…Second, talent policy support allows enterprises to access policy resources. Enterprises that receive talent policy support are often more likely to gain the government's trust, and the government, for its part, is more inclined to extend policy support to such enterprises to save on the costs associated with prior inspection, in-process supervision, and post-assessment (Kleer, 2010;Sein and Prokop, 2021). For example, the acquisition of R&D subsidies or tax incentives can reduce the innovation risk to enterprises or minimize R&D costs (Colombo et al, 2013;Jourdan and Kivleniece, 2017;Chen et al, 2019b).…”

Boosting Sustainability through Digital Transformation’s Domains and Resilience

“…According to business model innovation theory [39], if incumbents want to survive and create lean value, at first, they should understand the current business model and focus on people and their relationships and behaviors. Business process innovation deploys a novel and considerably enhanced production process and distribution mechanism [40]. Another study proposes a framework of dynamic capabilities that organizations can use for developing digital process innovation [41].…”