2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8655(02)00209-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Median strings for k-nearest neighbour classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This inconsistency is well known [12], and there have been a number of studies addressing this issue [8,21], with recently a specific analysis of the relationship between 0/1 loss functions and other discrete loss functions [22]. Other approaches include the introduction of heuristics to approximate the median string [13,15,1].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This inconsistency is well known [12], and there have been a number of studies addressing this issue [8,21], with recently a specific analysis of the relationship between 0/1 loss functions and other discrete loss functions [22]. Other approaches include the introduction of heuristics to approximate the median string [13,15,1].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kohonen, in 1985 [4], proposed an approximation algorithm to find the generalized median based on a process of perturbation of the set median in order to modify it in the direction of the generalized median string. This results was improved in 2000 by Martínez-Hinarejos et al [5] [6]. Moreover, their experiments showed that using the generalized median instead of the set median improved their results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This is a key difference with the algorithm in [1], which uses more operations per iteration. For each operation explored during an iteration, the algorithm computes the distance of the new candidate R 1 to all the elements in S (lines [16][17][18][19], which takes time OpNˆdcq, where dc is the time to compute the edit distance and depends on the specific measure used. By providing a better ranking, we save on the number of operations explored per iteration, and thus, on the number of times this distance is computed, which is expensive.…”
Section: Opmentioning
confidence: 99%