2010
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1760-10.2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medial Superior Olivary Neurons Receive Surprisingly Few Excitatory and Inhibitory Inputs with Balanced Strength and Short-Term Dynamics

Abstract: Neurons in the medial superior olive (MSO) process microsecond interaural time differences, the major cue for localizing low-frequency sounds, by comparing the relative arrival time of binaural, glutamatergic excitatory inputs. This coincidence detection mechanism is additionally shaped by highly specialized glycinergic inhibition. Traditionally, it is assumed that the binaural inputs are conveyed by many independent fibers, but such an anatomical arrangement may decrease temporal precision. Short-term depress… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
118
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(107 reference statements)
21
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using both anatomical and functional data, Couchman et al (2010) estimated that the total excitatory synaptic strength in gerbil MSO neurons (the sum of the synaptic conductances for all inputs) is 180-200 nS. This value is comparable to the 200 nS total synaptic strength used in the "fast" MSO model that gave good ITD sensitivity at 1000 Hz (Fig.…”
Section: Relation To Other Models and Limitations Of The Modelmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Using both anatomical and functional data, Couchman et al (2010) estimated that the total excitatory synaptic strength in gerbil MSO neurons (the sum of the synaptic conductances for all inputs) is 180-200 nS. This value is comparable to the 200 nS total synaptic strength used in the "fast" MSO model that gave good ITD sensitivity at 1000 Hz (Fig.…”
Section: Relation To Other Models and Limitations Of The Modelmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Synaptic input was modeled as the convergence of 32 independent excitatory fibers from each side and 32 contralateral inhibitory fibers, with each fiber firing in a time-varying Poisson-like manner at ϳ160 spikes/s for 2 s, and phase-locked to an input frequency f, with a vector strength R ϭ 0.9. The number of excitatory and inhibitory fibers was larger than the estimated minimum number necessary to evoke an action potential in MSO (Couchman et al 2010); however, a larger number may be necessary to maintain sustained activity given the substantial short-term synaptic depression in MSO (Couchman et al 2010). Phase-locking was achieved by choosing a synaptic event time in a given tone period as a Gaussian random number centered on zero with SD ϭ sqrt(Ϫ2logR)/(2f) (Mardia and Jupp 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Synapses with high P r , small RRPs, and strong STD appear well-suited for coding ITDs (Kuba et al, 2002;Cook et al, 2003;Yang and Xu-Friedman, 2009;Couchman et al, 2010), whereas synapses with low P r , large RRPs, and STF followed by slow depression are better tuned for coding ILDs (MacLeod et al, 2007;Yang and Xu-Friedman, 2009). Thus, it is tempting to speculate that calyces with simple morphologies filter timing information, those with complex morphologies filter intensity information, and those with intermediate morphologies filter a combination of both.…”
Section: Role In Sound Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%