1996
DOI: 10.1006/hbeh.1996.0055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medial Preoptic/Anterior Hypothalamic Lesions Induce a Female-Typical Profile of Sexual Partner Preference in Male Ferrets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of any effect of POA/AH lesions in female ferrets contrasts with our previous studies using male ferrets in which either excitotoxic (Paredes and Baum, 1995) or electrolytic (Kindon et al, 1996) lesions of the POA/AH caused a reversal of partner preference. These lesions, which bilaterally damaged the sexually dimorphic male nucleus (MN) of the ferret's POA/AH (Tobet et al, 1986), thereby duplicated the preference profile seen in sham-operated control females.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The absence of any effect of POA/AH lesions in female ferrets contrasts with our previous studies using male ferrets in which either excitotoxic (Paredes and Baum, 1995) or electrolytic (Kindon et al, 1996) lesions of the POA/AH caused a reversal of partner preference. These lesions, which bilaterally damaged the sexually dimorphic male nucleus (MN) of the ferret's POA/AH (Tobet et al, 1986), thereby duplicated the preference profile seen in sham-operated control females.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In male ferrets, perinatal exposure to testosterone of testicular origin and/or to estradiol synthesized by aromatization of this testosterone in the developing hypothalamus promotes a male-typical differentiation of a preference to seek out body odors emitted from females (Baum et al, 1990). Our prior experiments (Alekseyenko et al, submitted for publication; Kindon et al, 1996;Paredes and Baum, 1995) suggest that this male-typical profile of female-directed preference depends on the differentiation of sexually dimorphic MH-POA/AH which may override any VMHdependent processing of body odors leading to a female-typical preference to approach male odors. In male rodents, the capacity to display sexually receptive (lordosis) behavior in response to adult ovarian hormone treatment is dramatically reduced due to the defeminizing action of estradiol during perinatal brain sexual differentiation (reviewed in Baum, 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, MPOA lesions did not affect the frequency of masturbation in monkeys [58] or noncontact erections, a measure of psychogenic erections, in rats [59]. In contrast to those studies, lesions of the MPOA diminished preference for a female partner in rats [60 -62] and ferrets [63,64], decreased pursuit of a female by male rats [65], and inhibited precopulatory behavior in marmosets [66], suggesting that the MPOA may indeed be important for the appetitive aspects of sexual behavior. Therefore, the MPOA contributes to, but is not essential for, sexual motivation.…”
Section: Role Of the Mpoa In Regulating Male Sexual Motivationmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Thus, bilateral lesions of the VMH (but not of the mPOA) in female ferrets blocked their preference to seek out male vs. female volatile pheromones, without disrupting subjects' ability to discriminate between these same odors when they were presented sequentially in habituation/dishabituation tests (Robarts and Baum, 2007). By contrast, bilateral lesions of the sexually dimorphic male nucleus of the POA/AH (Kindon et al, 1996;Paredes and Baum, 1995) actually reversed the normal heterosexual odor preference of male ferrets so that after receiving this lesion they preferred to approach volatile odors from other males (homosexual preference). This switch in odor preference following POA/ AH lesions implies that in the absence of this male-specific cluster Fig.…”
Section: Sex Differences In Sexual Partner Preference: Contribution Omentioning
confidence: 93%