Abstract:Patellar instability is a common cause of knee disability in children and adolescent, with a high recurrence rate. When conservative treatment fails, surgical options should be considered. The femoral insertion of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is in close proximity to the distal femoral growth plate and precautions should be taken to avoid injuries to the physis. Anatomical features of the MPFL complex, with focus on the relationship between femoral MPFL attachment and femoral physis, are discussed… Show more
“…Several techniques were proposed, using adductor magnus tendon, MCL, or an anatomic epiphyseal tunnel. 12 Deie et al. 1 were the first to use the MCL for femoral attachment in their reconstructions: the harvested proximal end of semitendinosus is looped around the posterior third of the MCL and fixed on the periosteum of the patella, while its distal tibial end remains anatomically attached.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many techniques for MPFL reconstruction in children, adolescents, and adults have been described over time. 12 , 19 , 20 An advantage of our technique is that it is implant-free, so the cost of the procedure is lower. The likelihood of residual pain 11 is reduced due to the “manual” tensioning at the quadriceps level, which is not a stiff point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 3 , 4 Following a patellar dislocation, the chances are almost 100% that the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) was injured. 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 Many procedures for MPFL restoration are now available, 2 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 especially developed to restore this main contributor in preventing lateral patellar dislocation. 1 Recently, several studies have revealed the importance of the medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL) in restoring patellar stability.…”
“…Several techniques were proposed, using adductor magnus tendon, MCL, or an anatomic epiphyseal tunnel. 12 Deie et al. 1 were the first to use the MCL for femoral attachment in their reconstructions: the harvested proximal end of semitendinosus is looped around the posterior third of the MCL and fixed on the periosteum of the patella, while its distal tibial end remains anatomically attached.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many techniques for MPFL reconstruction in children, adolescents, and adults have been described over time. 12 , 19 , 20 An advantage of our technique is that it is implant-free, so the cost of the procedure is lower. The likelihood of residual pain 11 is reduced due to the “manual” tensioning at the quadriceps level, which is not a stiff point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 3 , 4 Following a patellar dislocation, the chances are almost 100% that the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) was injured. 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 Many procedures for MPFL restoration are now available, 2 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 especially developed to restore this main contributor in preventing lateral patellar dislocation. 1 Recently, several studies have revealed the importance of the medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL) in restoring patellar stability.…”
“…Hardware-free MPFL reconstruction was initially developed for skeletally immature patients to avoid growth damage to the distal femur physis [17,51,61,63]. However, this technique has also been extended to the adult population [18,33,35,36].…”
Purpose
This systematic review evaluated the clinical outcomes of hardware-free MPFL reconstruction techniques in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability, focusing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), redislocation rate, and complications. The hypothesis was that hardware-free MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability is safe and effective.
Methods
This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Virtual Health Library databases were accessed in October 2021. All the clinical studies investigating the efficacy and feasibility of hardware-free MPFL reconstruction were screened for inclusion. Only studies with a minimum 24-month follow-up were considered eligible. Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale improvement and redislocation rate after surgical treatment were evaluated as primary outcomes. The rate of postoperative complications was evaluated as a secondary outcome. The quality of the methodological assessment was assessed using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score.
Results
Eight studies were included in the present systematic review. The quality of the methodological assessment was moderate. Short- to long-term improvement of Kujala score was observed in all included studies. Mean score improvement ranged from + 13.2/100 to + 54/100, with mean postoperative scores ranging from 82/100 to 94/100. Patellar redislocation was observed in 8.33% (8 of 96) patients.
Conclusion
Hardware-free MPFL reconstruction with or without associated soft-tissue or bony realignment procedures provided reliable clinical improvements and was associated with a low rate of redislocation in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability. Advantages such as safety, femoral physis preservation, and comparable complication profiles with implant-based techniques endorse its implementation. Orthopedic surgeons in cost-sensitive environments may also benefit their patients with lower costs, no need for implants, lack of implant-related complications, or surgery for implant removal.
Level of evidence: Level IV.
“…The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the primary medial stabilizer of the patella and its injury is more common during the pediatric age [15, 17]. The most common cause is traumatic patellar dislocation, which also sets the stage for subsequent recurrent instability [9]. After the initial dislocation, patients tend to re‐dislocate in up to 90% of cases [5].…”
PurposeTo describe the proximity of the neurovascular structures surrounding the adductor magnus (ADM), to delineate a safe boundary focusing on the techniques used during graft harvest and to evaluate whether the length of the ADM tendon is sufficient for safe medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction.
MethodsSixteen formalin‐fixed cadavers were dissected. The area surrounding the ADM, the adductor tubercle (AT) and the adductor hiatus was exposed. The following measurements were performed: the (1) total length of MPFL, (2) distance between the AT and the saphenous nerve, (3) the point where the saphenous nerve pierces the vasto‐adductor membrane, (4) the point where the saphenous nerve crosses the ADM tendon, (5) the musculotendinous junction of the ADM tendon, and (6) the point where the vascular structures exit the adductor hiatus. Additionally, (7) the distance between the ADM musculotendinous junction and the nearest vessel (popliteal artery), (8) the distance between the ADM (at the level where the saphenous nerve crosses) and the nearest vessel, (9) the length between the AT and the superior medial genicular artery, and finally (10) the depth between the AT and the superior medial genicular artery were analyzed.
ResultsThe in situ length of the native MPFL was 47.6 ± 42.2 mm. The saphenous nerve pierces the vasto‐adductor membrane at a mean distance of 100 mm, although it crosses the ADM itself at an average of 67.6 mm. The vascular structures, on the other hand, become vulnerable at a distance of 89.1 ± 114.0 mm from the AT. After harvesting the ADM tendon, the mean length was found to be 46.9 mm, which was insufficient for fixation. Partial release from the AT resulted in a more adequate length for fixation (65.4 ± 88.7 mm).
ConclusionThe adductor magnus tendon is a viable option for the dynamic reconstruction of the MPFL. Knowledge of the surrounding busy neurovascular topography is paramount for a procedure typically performed in a minimally invasive way. The study results are clinically relevant, as they suggest that tendons should be shorter than the minimum distance from the nerve. If in some cases the length of the MPFL is longer than the distance of the ADM from the nerve, the results suggest that a partial dissection of the anatomical structures might be needed. Direct visualization of the harvesting region might be considered in such cases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.