2020
DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-19-00049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Medial Femoral Condyle Vascularized Bone Graft for Treatment of Midshaft Clavicle Recalcitrant Nonunion With Use of the Transverse Cervical Artery as an Anastomosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, the search strategy yielded 10 papers, 1 2 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 encompassing a total of 26 patients who underwent a unilateral vascularized MFC flap for clavicle reconstruction. Mean number of patients per study was 2.6, with a median of 1.5 and interquartile range of 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, the search strategy yielded 10 papers, 1 2 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 encompassing a total of 26 patients who underwent a unilateral vascularized MFC flap for clavicle reconstruction. Mean number of patients per study was 2.6, with a median of 1.5 and interquartile range of 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thoracoacromial vessels were the most commonly utilized in our review, though it has been noted that due to local scarring, they can be difficult to access, in which case the transverse cervical vessels may be of more utility. 21 Both have been well described in the plastic and reconstructive surgery literature and establishing access to these should be within the armamentarium of the reconstructive surgeon. [53][54][55] In certain situations, the concept of the reconstructive elevator (i.e., early utilization of the more complex and more appropriate operation) may be more suitable than the reconstructive ladder approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The medial femur condyle (MFC) flap has been popularized as an alternative for microsurgical reconstruction of small and medium bone defects (Del Pinal et al, 2007; Sakai et al, 1991). Originally described as a periosteal flap, it has been used in the cortico‐periosteal form for the reconstruction of long bones and successfully also for the clavicula (Belyea et al, 2020; Fuchs et al, 2005) and the scaphoid (Deng et al, 2020; Keating et al, 2021; Keller et al, 2020; Pet & Higgins, 2019). Its main advantages are the versatility and the possibility to customize the flap to irregular bones and the possibility to include cartilage as an osteochondral flap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several case series reporting the outcome of surgical treatment with vascularized autografts have been published. 26 35 In the largest reported case series of seven patients, with segmental defects between 2 and 5 cm, consolidation was achieved in all patients using a vascularized medial femoral condyle autograft. 29 Smaller series describing the clinical outcome of vascularized medial femoral condyle grafts and vascularized fibular grafts in segmental defects between 2 and 12 cm reported consolidation in 60–75% of the patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%