2016
DOI: 10.1177/1363460715604330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Media, visibility and sexual identity among gay men with a migration background

Abstract: While media are generally acknowledged to play an important role in processes of sexual identity formation among sexual minorities, little is known about migrant audiences. This article explores the roles of mass and online media for a group of men with a migration background living in Belgium. Based on in-depth interviews, their sexual self-identification is discussed, as is their use and assessment of media as a source of representations, information and connections. The participants in this project turn out… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies involving refugees have shown that families’ access to communication technology in their home countries has become a means of burdening refugees with financial requests (Lindley 2009). Likewise, families’ and friends’ easy access to Internet phone calls and connections through social media have increased the risks of exposing gay refugees’ sexual identities (Binnie and Klesse 2013; Dhoest 2016). This latter consequence testifies to the fact that social fields and their respective structures stretch beyond national borders to influence refugees’ lives in their host country (see Portes [1998] and Zontini [2010] for their discussions of how social capital may restrict immigrants’ opportunities in the host society).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies involving refugees have shown that families’ access to communication technology in their home countries has become a means of burdening refugees with financial requests (Lindley 2009). Likewise, families’ and friends’ easy access to Internet phone calls and connections through social media have increased the risks of exposing gay refugees’ sexual identities (Binnie and Klesse 2013; Dhoest 2016). This latter consequence testifies to the fact that social fields and their respective structures stretch beyond national borders to influence refugees’ lives in their host country (see Portes [1998] and Zontini [2010] for their discussions of how social capital may restrict immigrants’ opportunities in the host society).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar narrative frames the internal migration of sexual minorities as a unidirectional move from rural patriarchy to urban freedom which, mainly, awaits the white middle-class lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgenders (LGBTs; Duggan [2003] 2012; Gorman-Murray 2007). Although some (and growing) attention is given to sexual-racial minority immigrants ’ ties with their home countries (Ayoub and Bauman 2018; Binnie and Klesse 2013; Carrillo 2018; Dhoest 2016; Mepschen, Duyvendak, and Tonkens 2010), the nascent body of literature on queer migration has neglected sexual-racial minority refugees’ transnational lives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large body of texts within the main field of Production Studies (see Caldwell, 2008; Deuze, 2007; Mayer et al, 2009) somewhat overlooks questions about sexuality, sexual identity and queerness. Much of the focus around LGBT sexual identity in Media Studies pertains to issues of representation (see Barnhurst, 2007; Gross, 2001; Walters, 2001) along with analyses of LGBT screen audiences (Dhoest, 2016; Kern, 2014). Inasmuch as LGBT representation and audiences have been a central focus to research, scholarship is beginning to turn towards the ways in which media industries produce LGBT sexual identities.…”
Section: Lgbt Workers and Queer Production Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond Ireland, there is a considerable amount of research on the representation of LGBT sexuality on screen (Beirne, 2012;Dyer, 1990;Gross, 2001;Russo, 1981) as well as analyses of LGBT screen audiences (Dhoest, 2016;Kern, 2014). With the exception of a few key texts (Caldwell, 2008;Mayer, 2016;Moore, 2009), LGBT production of media has been less extensively researched and a focus on radio is even rarer.…”
Section: Irish Radio and Lgbt Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%