“…As Yatsyk (2020, p. 148) outlines, the Polish PiS-party’s communication “is inherently performative and as such it appeals to emotions, and […] it directly communicates with ‘people’ while circumventing the existing institutional framework of the state.” Quite similar, Aranda (2023, p. 570) has demonstrated the structural analogy between “[t]he exigency of an unmediated, individual access to God’s voice found in both Pentecostalism and the Prosperity Gospel” and the direct, non-institutional communication with the people in populist politics. In the same vein, Ragragio (2023, p. 49) analyzes “the God metanarrative—Religious Duterte, Catholic Church, Apollo Quiboloy, and Daily Prayer—and […] how God-related posts amplify the communicative style of populism in the Philippines.” In addition, Duterte’s TV morning show aimed at establishing a direct-line to individuals, through which supposedly everyone could address Duterte with complaints and individual problems (see de Guzman, 2017) in order to find a hearing with the president, get his understanding, and receive guidance and relief. This format demonstrates the willingness of taking care of very concrete, maybe even rather minor problems of the flock members, reflecting “a permanent intervention in everyday conduct (conduite), in the management of lives” (Foucault, 2009, p. 154).…”