2015
DOI: 10.1177/1350507615617634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Media for reflection: A comparison of renaissance mirrors for princes and contemporary management education

Abstract: This article develops the concept media for reflection in the interest of conceptualizing the interpretative frames that enable and limit reflection in management and leadership education. The concept 'media for reflection' allows us to conceptualize the social and cultural mediation of reflection without reducing reflection to an effect of the social structures and cultural norms in which it is embedded. Based on the developed theoretical framework, this article analyses how a renaissance 'mirror for princes'… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leadership reform in Denmark in 2007 specified that all public managers had the right (often also obligation) to have at least a bachelor’s degree in management. This prompted huge growth in MLDPs – of both formal programmes at educational institutions and of in-house programmes (Knudsen, 2016). The MLDP we followed in the Capital Region was by far the most ambitious in terms of the number of participants and duration in the history of the Region.…”
Section: Methodology – Case Data and Analytical Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leadership reform in Denmark in 2007 specified that all public managers had the right (often also obligation) to have at least a bachelor’s degree in management. This prompted huge growth in MLDPs – of both formal programmes at educational institutions and of in-house programmes (Knudsen, 2016). The MLDP we followed in the Capital Region was by far the most ambitious in terms of the number of participants and duration in the history of the Region.…”
Section: Methodology – Case Data and Analytical Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given reflexivity is commonly understood and practised as a vehicle by which the researcher or research process is made visible and explicitly scrutinized, the first and most recognizable tension can be likened to a simple choice between focusing on the ‘I’ (in this tension the researcher) or the ‘it’ (in this tension the research). In this same vein, reflexivity has been identified with ‘a process of reflecting on the mirror’s mirroring’, with the researcher being the ‘I’ ‘who holds the mirror’ (Gemignani, 2017: 190; see also Knudsen, 2016). What the mirror sees when the researcher becomes the subject and object of reflexivity is any combination of experiences, memories, associations, preferences, priorities and traits that the researcher deems relevant to the research process.…”
Section: Four Tensions In Reflexivity Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important stream in the literature on MLD consists of presentations of programmes (Greve and Pedersen, 2017;Kearns, 2019;Sandfort et al, 2017;van der Meer and Marks, 2018), courses and pedagogical approaches (Engbers, 2019;Henson, 2019), and innovations and experiments (Edwards et al, 2013(Edwards et al, , 2015Straussman, 2019;Sutherland, 2013). In the discussions of programmes and pedagogical approaches reflexivity (and related concepts like reflection and critical reflexivity) has been a core theme (Larsson and Knudsen, 2021;Knudsen, 2016). Scholarship has discussed why reflexivity is needed and how it can be promoted (Adriansen and Knudsen, 2013;Cunliffe, 2002).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%