Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Entrepreneurship 2007
DOI: 10.4337/9781847204387.00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Media Discourse in Entrepreneurship Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In textbooks or teaching cases in business this is still very typical; the main protagonist is still normally a man, and women are, if at all present, in secondary and supportive roles (Achtenhagen & Welter, 2005;Baker, et al, 1997;Jones, 2009). …”
Section: Implications and Critiquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In textbooks or teaching cases in business this is still very typical; the main protagonist is still normally a man, and women are, if at all present, in secondary and supportive roles (Achtenhagen & Welter, 2005;Baker, et al, 1997;Jones, 2009). …”
Section: Implications and Critiquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In effect, the defining characteristics of the entrepreneur are also those which define masculinity and so, unsurprisingly, men dominate as high profile entrepreneurial role models (Ahl, 2006;Marlow, Henry, & Carter, 2009). Consequently, women have not featured within the mindset or image of what an entrepreneur is or should be (Achtenhagen & Welter, 2005;Baker, Aldrich, & Liou, 1997). Such gender bias is of critical importance not only as a social injustice but, given the current focus upon individualised attainment within an entrepreneuring epoch, women are positioned in deficit unless they acknowledge and subscribe to a masculinised discourse.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discourse analysis by feminist discursive theorists illuminate how the discussion of entrepreneurship assumes the masculine ideal type, as it is based on the male mentality, experience, imagery, and perceptual lens (Achtenhagen and Welter, 2007;De Bruin et al, 2006;Bruni et al, 2004). Importantly, these scholars turn the lens back on the researcher and discipline, noting how the very research practices we engage in, even if intending to close the gender gap, may end up perpetuating the dominant masculine model by reproducing social reality (Ahl, 2002(Ahl, , 2006.…”
Section: Varieties Of Feminismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collective forms of discourse are viewed as the product of many mutual interactions [5]. Through discourse individual beliefs, practices, and knowledge can construct integrity and offer a way of sharing understanding of the existing world [5].Achtenhagen and Welter [1]constructed three stages of the discourse analysis: to analyze a wide range of discourse to find out the general discourse patterns andthe hidden data; to analyze the cross-leveled discourse focused on the primary and secondary discourse topics and the conveyed images through language; and to connect discourse and context, and to analyze the relationship between the subjective and objective data. In this discourse analysis, the mission is to explore the relationship between discourse and reality.…”
Section: Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also provides a hierarchical system andcontextual meaningsof personal experiences [1]. Collective forms of discourse are viewed as the product of many mutual interactions [5].…”
Section: Discourse Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%