Media coverage, attention cycles and the governance of plastics pollution

Abstract

Fluctuations in media and public attention create major challenges for the governance of environmental problems but detailed investigations of how issue‐attention cycles affect environmental governance processes remain limited. This article addresses this gap using a literature analysis to examine the effects of issue‐attention cycles on policy responses to plastics pollution. It explores trends and features of media coverage of plastics, their influence on public pressure for action, linkages between shifts in attention and measures to govern plastics at the international, national, sub‐national and corporate levels, and options to utilise issue‐attention cycles to support greater action on plastics. The review indicates that heightened media coverage has encouraged greater public engagement with plastics overall but that elements of media reporting raise questions about the coherence and longevity of public pressure for change. Links between attention peaks and increased policy activity also remain unclear, though some policy‐makers have used peaks to inject momentum into policy processes and initiate longer‐term reforms that buffer policy against declining interest. Alongside these techniques, new framings emphasising the economic, social and health impacts of plastics may assist in extending concern and pressure for action. The article concludes by arguing the need to deepen understandings of the properties of attention cycles for different environmental problems and their implications for governance efforts.

Exploring Scientific Discourse on Marine Litter in Europe: Review of Sources, Causes and Solutions

“…Future research should also focus on the marine litter discourse outside of the scientific literature to examine how scientifically generated knowledge is used in policymaking processes and in public debates ( [16,95] are for the present solitary examples of such analyses). This recommendation is twofold.…”

An imperative to focus the plastic pollution problem on place-based solutions

“…A risk to any policy, particularly those that arise from surges in public interest, is its discontinued or delayed implementation due to changes in elected governments, political agenda, and public attention (Bailey, 2022). Amid the disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic, Australia moved forward with policy actions that target reducing plastic waste.…”

Theoretically predicting the solubility of polydisperse polymers using Flory–Huggins theory

“…At the same time, awareness of the environmental impact of plastics is growing, as reflected by an increasing number of scientific publications [4] and media coverage [5]. Part of the solution to the problems with fossil-fuel-based polymeric materials is the development of new bio-based polymeric materials.…”

“…Carbon dioxide is captured in bio-based feedstock, [6] and using bio-based polymers instead of fossil feedstock-based polymers reduces greenhouse gas emissions [7]. However, despite the attention for the environmental impact of plastics [4,5] and the high substitution potential for bio-based alternatives, [8,9] polymeric materials are still largely based on fossil-feedstock [3].…”