2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2905388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Media Coverage and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns: Chinese Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fang and Peress (2009) document the impact of mass media coverage on cross-sectional stock returns and propose what they call the "mass media effect": stocks with lower mass media coverage earn higher returns. This effect has been demonstrated in various countries (Ferguson et al, 2015;Aman et al, 2018;Griffin et al, 2011;Turner et al, 2018;Zou, Cao and Wang, 2018). Fang and Peress (2009) and others explain the mass media effect through the " investor recognition hypothesis" of Merton (1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Fang and Peress (2009) document the impact of mass media coverage on cross-sectional stock returns and propose what they call the "mass media effect": stocks with lower mass media coverage earn higher returns. This effect has been demonstrated in various countries (Ferguson et al, 2015;Aman et al, 2018;Griffin et al, 2011;Turner et al, 2018;Zou, Cao and Wang, 2018). Fang and Peress (2009) and others explain the mass media effect through the " investor recognition hypothesis" of Merton (1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%