2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2002.00376.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mecillinam susceptibility as an indicator of β-lactamase production in Staphylococcus aureus

Abstract: The use of direct susceptibility testing from specimens has led to the fortuitous observation that penicillin-susceptible strains have larger inhibition zones for mecillinam than do beta-lactamase producers. The current study was, therefore, undertaken to test 179 Staphylococcus aureus isolates for mecillinam susceptibility by Rosco Neo-Sensitabs and to compare the results with commonly used tests for beta-lactamase production, i.e. size and character of penicillin inhibition zones, chromogenic cephalosporin (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The breakpoint recommended by the CLSI to classify penicillin-resistant isolates by the disk diffusion method showed a sensitivity of 72.2%, a value higher than the 57.1% reported by Kaase et al 15 In this study, the sensitivity of the nitrocefin test (28.9%) was lower than that obtained by these authors (39.3%) and by others: 82.0%, 33 86.2%, 34 95.6%, 23 70.8–97.9% depending on the induction method and agar used, 24 and 62.1–100% depending on the manufacturer 26 . The large difference in the sensitivity of the nitrocefin test between the present study and the studies cited may be related to the fact that we mainly evaluated S. saprophyticus .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…The breakpoint recommended by the CLSI to classify penicillin-resistant isolates by the disk diffusion method showed a sensitivity of 72.2%, a value higher than the 57.1% reported by Kaase et al 15 In this study, the sensitivity of the nitrocefin test (28.9%) was lower than that obtained by these authors (39.3%) and by others: 82.0%, 33 86.2%, 34 95.6%, 23 70.8–97.9% depending on the induction method and agar used, 24 and 62.1–100% depending on the manufacturer 26 . The large difference in the sensitivity of the nitrocefin test between the present study and the studies cited may be related to the fact that we mainly evaluated S. saprophyticus .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…In contrast to previous reports, an unacceptably low sensitivity of 39.3% was found for nitrocefin tests, even after induction by penicillin and incubation for 60 min. Sensitivities reported previously for nitrocefin tests were 82% [6], 86.2% [7], 95.6% [8], 70.8–97.9%, depending on the induction method and agar used [4], and 62.1–100%, depending on the manufacturer of the nitrocefin assay [9]. In addition, a sensitivity of 100% has been reported previously for the starch–iodine plate method following penicillinase induction [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food is the main source for the transfer of antibiotic resistance, possibly through the ingestion of resistant food-borne strains [30,31]. The inhibition zone of mecillinam can be considered as an indicator for the critical qualification of producer/non-producer β lactamase S.aureus [32]. All the sensitive isolates within the mecillinam inhibition zone of less than 17mm could be considered as β lactamase producer S.aureus isolates.…”
Section: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Of S Aureus Isolatesmentioning
confidence: 99%