1983
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(83)90050-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanosensory projections to cuneate, gracile, and external cuneate nuclei in a tree squirrel (fox squirrel, Sciurus Niger)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At similar levels, C5 and C6 segments had dense focal projections ven tral to the C,s terminal zone. Those patterns included the territory where palmar pads were shown to be represented and support the finding that ulnar digits were mapped dorsal to radial digits [Ostapoff et al, 1982]. The central and ventral projection sites in both caudal and cell nest regions in the squirrel also correspond to the regions in the cat where la muscle and other deep modalities were reported to have a major input [Rosen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At similar levels, C5 and C6 segments had dense focal projections ven tral to the C,s terminal zone. Those patterns included the territory where palmar pads were shown to be represented and support the finding that ulnar digits were mapped dorsal to radial digits [Ostapoff et al, 1982]. The central and ventral projection sites in both caudal and cell nest regions in the squirrel also correspond to the regions in the cat where la muscle and other deep modalities were reported to have a major input [Rosen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…1980], The present report de scribes the distribution of cervical dorsal root fibers to the tree squirrel DCN and adjacent nuclei. Attention was given spe cifically to the relationship between the organization of ascending root fibers, their terminal patterns and the somatic and modality organization of the DCN in the squirrel [Ostapoff et al, 1982] and other animals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it is likely that nearly all of the labeled terminations in the gracile nuclei of the present experiments belonged to the functional classes of slowly (SA) and rapidly (RA) adapting afferents that subserve the skin of monkeys and other mammals. While responses of neurons to deep receptor (muscle spindle) stimulation have been reported for neurons in the region of the gracile nuclei (Ostapoff et al, 1983), these were neurons in rostral locations that likely correspond to deep receptor nuclei for the hindlimb (nucleus Z; Landgren and Silfvenius, 1971) that complement the external cuneate nucleus with muscle spindle receptor inputs from the forelimb (Abrahams and Swett, 1986). Such deep and cutaneous afferents are mixed in the lumber levels of the gracile fasciculus, but they sort out so that only cutaneous mechanoreceptors are represented at cervical levels of the gracile fasciculus (Whitsel et al, 1969(Whitsel et al, , 1972.…”
Section: Functional Implications Of the Anatomical Organization Of Thmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Projections from the tail were located in the extreme medial region of the gracile nucleus, followed laterally by a region with inputs from the heel, a still more lateral region for the knee, and a hip region occupying the extreme lateral portion of the nucleus. In fox squirrels, Ostapoff et al (1983) stressed the dorsoventral organization of the gracile nucleus, as recordings along vertical electrode penetrations encountered neurons successively responsive to the tail, foot, leg, and trunk. In opossums, recordings from the gracile nucleus revealed that the foot is represented lateral to that of the tail, and dorsal to that of the leg, but few additional details were reported (Hamilton and Johnson, 1973).…”
Section: Gracile Nuclei Of Other Mammalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the DCN, used here to include nucleus gracilis (GN), nucleus cuneatus (CN), and external cuneate nucleus (EC), these fibers are now known to reach particular nuclei, subnuclei, andor areas within subnuclei based on their somatotopic origins (Campbell et al, 1974;Johnson et al, 1968;Kruger et al, 1961) and, to a lesser extent, on their modalities (Blum et al, 1975;Dykes et al, 1982;Millar and Basbaum, 1975;Ostapoff et al, 1983). With the background provided by these studies of somatotopy and modality sorting in several mammalian species, it is possible to examine the distribution of dorsal root fibers to the DCN in any species and to draw limited conclusions about the locations and relative densities of classes of receptors in skin vs. muscle supplied by that particular root.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%