“…S10 and S11). Both of the bifunctionalized polymer networks showed very similar adsorption selectivities of 4.0 for CO 2 /CH 4 and 30 for CO 2 /N 2 at 273 K. The CO 2 / N 2 adsorption selectivity by both of the polymer networks is comparable to that of some other MOPs under the similar conditions, such as the triazine-functionalized CMPs (9.0e25.2 at 298 K) [50], the amide-functionalized CMPs (8.5e12 at 298 K) [26], the imine-linked porous polymer frameworks (14.5e20.4 at 273 K) [52], the carbazolic porous organic frameworks (19À37 at 273 K) [58], and the nanoporous azo-linked polymers (30e43 at 273 K) [34], though it is lower than that of some other reported MOPs with the CO 2 /N 2 adsorption selectivity higher than 100, such as the azobridged covalent organic polymer of Azo-COP-2 with a CO 2 /N 2 adsorption selectivity of 109 at 273 K [59], the porous benzimidazole-linked polymer of BILP-2 with a CO 2 /N 2 adsorption selectivity of 113 at 273 K [48], the PPN-6-SO 3 NH 4 with a CO 2 /N 2 adsorption selectivity of 196 at 295 K, and the tri(4-ethynylphenyl) amine-based porous aromatic framework with amine groups of PAF-33eNH 2 with the CO 2 /N 2 adsorption selectivity as high as 250 at 273 K [29]. However, the absolute amount of CO 2 adsorbed was only 1.19 mmol g À1 for PAF-33eNH 2 at 273 K/1.0 bar [29], much lower than that of the BFCMP-2 (2.77 mmol g À1 at 273 K/1.13 bar) in this work.…”