2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10237-019-01158-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanobiological osteocyte feedback drives mechanostat regulation of bone in a multiscale computational model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…bone-forming cells) and osteoclasts (i.e. bone-resorbing cells) [82][83][84] where the mechanical stimulus exceeds, or is lower, than its homeostatic value [85,86]. Typically based on animal studies [87][88][89], these models can be used for determining the amount of bone deposited, or resorbed, as a function of exercise, individual metabolism, diet and pharmacological treatment [90, 91•, 92] for different anatomical locations and bone types [87][88][89].…”
Section: A Perspective Toward Personalized Exercise Prescriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bone-forming cells) and osteoclasts (i.e. bone-resorbing cells) [82][83][84] where the mechanical stimulus exceeds, or is lower, than its homeostatic value [85,86]. Typically based on animal studies [87][88][89], these models can be used for determining the amount of bone deposited, or resorbed, as a function of exercise, individual metabolism, diet and pharmacological treatment [90, 91•, 92] for different anatomical locations and bone types [87][88][89].…”
Section: A Perspective Toward Personalized Exercise Prescriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in previous models, the RANK-RANKL-OPG pathway, together with the action of several regulatory factors on bone cells, including TGF-β, PTH, and mechanobiological feedback is given (for details on original models see Pivonka et al, 2008Pivonka et al, , 2010Scheiner et al, 2013;Pivonka et al, 2012;Martínez-Reina and Pivonka, 2019). The new model has been designed following the structure of the original model, adding the population of osteocytes, as done in Martin et al (2019), slightly modifying the mechanoregulation feedback and adding new features relevant to the formulation of damage, the last two modifications being dealt with in subsections 2.3 and 2.4, respectively.…”
Section: Model Of Bone Cell Interactions In Bone Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) act is a function of the mechanical stimulus that regulates the anabolic part of the mechanobiological feedback in the proliferation term and will be addressed in section 2.3. Finally, η is the concentration of osteocytes in bone matrix, which is assumed constant as in Martin et al (2019), thus leading to proportional variations of osteocytes population and fraction of bone matrix volume per total volume, f bm (Equation 4). The variation of f bm over time is precisely one of the main outcomes to be derived from the set of cell population equations and is defined through the balance between resorbed and formed tissue:…”
Section: Model Of Bone Cell Interactions In Bone Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, mechano-chemo-biological models, which derive from the ODE models previously mentioned, have appeared. Very few articles have considered this type of models in their investigations (Klika et al, 2013;Avval et al, 2014;Lerebours et al, 2016;Pastrama et al, 2018;Martin et al, 2019;Ashrafi et al, 2020). Nevertheless, we think that they are very promising as they englobe each of mechanical, biological, and biochemical features of bone.…”
Section: Mathematical Models Of Bone Remodelingmentioning
confidence: 99%