2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.clet.2022.100487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanization in rice farming reduces greenhouse gas emissions, food losses, and constitutes a positive business case for smallholder farmers – Results from a controlled experiment in Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Food Loss and Waste mechanisation. Retaining more grain results in overall lower emissions per unit of product, and, generally speaking, the value of these avoided losses covers the economic expense of mechanisation (Castelein et al, 2021;Gummert et al, 2020;Nguyen-Van-Hung et al, 2018). Likewise, plant breeding for high-yielding, shortduration, and stress-tolerant varieties is an investment in mitigation, alongside agronomic management interventions, despite not often being construed as such (Ortiz-Monasterio et al, 2010).…”
Section: Hotspot Analysis Of Food Loss and Waste And Associated Green...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Food Loss and Waste mechanisation. Retaining more grain results in overall lower emissions per unit of product, and, generally speaking, the value of these avoided losses covers the economic expense of mechanisation (Castelein et al, 2021;Gummert et al, 2020;Nguyen-Van-Hung et al, 2018). Likewise, plant breeding for high-yielding, shortduration, and stress-tolerant varieties is an investment in mitigation, alongside agronomic management interventions, despite not often being construed as such (Ortiz-Monasterio et al, 2010).…”
Section: Hotspot Analysis Of Food Loss and Waste And Associated Green...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a controlled experiment on smallholder rice farms in Nigeria, we measured the impact of mechanising farm activities (Castelein et al, 2021) (Figure 10.2). Results showed that switching to mechanised harvesting and threshing reduces harvest paddy losses from 9.6 percent to 0.9 percent, and increases threshing efficiency from 31.1 percent to 33.1 percent.…”
Section: Hotspot Analysis Of Food Loss and Waste And Associated Green...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This case study shows how efficiently mechanisation can lessen environmental impact and FL, while increasing food production and farmer income. Retaining more grain results in overall lower emissions per unit of product, and, generally speaking, the value of these avoided losses covers the economic expense of mechanisation (Castelein et al, 2021;Gummert et al, 2020;Nguyen-Van-Hung et al, 2018). Likewise, plant breeding for high-yielding, shortduration, and stress-tolerant varieties is an investment in mitigation, alongside agronomic management interventions, despite not often being construed as such (Ortiz-Monasterio et al, 2010).…”
Section: Hotspot Analysis Of Food Loss and Waste And Associated Green...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hasil Bumi, Kediri, Jawa Timur. Produksi yang dilakukan dengan cara menghimpun padi dari penyuplai, kemudian diproses pada mesin Power Threser untuk memisahkan beras dengan gabahnya [2], [3]. Beras dilakukan tahap mutu premium menggunakan standar PERMENDAG 57 tahun 2017 dan SNI 6128:2020 [4], dikemas, dan didistribusikan ke distributor.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified