2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.12.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanistic understanding toward the toxicity of graphene-family materials to freshwater algae

Abstract: We systematically investigated the toxicity mechanism of three graphene-family materials (GFMs), graphene oxide (GO), reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and multi-layer graphene (MG), to algae (Chlorella pyrenoidosa). GFMs exhibited much higher toxicity than other carbon materials (carbon nanotube and graphite), with the 96 h median effective concentration (EC) values of 37.3 (GO), 34.0 (rGO), and 62.2 (MG) mg/L. Shading effect contributed approximately 16.4% of growth inhibition by GO due to its higher dispersibili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
108
2
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(55 reference statements)
11
108
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar observation when there was more toxicity of GO on algal cells compared to CNT was observed in a recent study by Zhao et al, possibly due to GO's hydrophilic surface and strong electrostatic repulsion between GO sheets. Lv et al reported that GO could be more toxic than other carbon nanomaterials due to its enhanced dispersibility and high hydrophilicity, whereas CNTs are hydrophobic nanomaterials that are likely to form more aggregates.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…A similar observation when there was more toxicity of GO on algal cells compared to CNT was observed in a recent study by Zhao et al, possibly due to GO's hydrophilic surface and strong electrostatic repulsion between GO sheets. Lv et al reported that GO could be more toxic than other carbon nanomaterials due to its enhanced dispersibility and high hydrophilicity, whereas CNTs are hydrophobic nanomaterials that are likely to form more aggregates.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Because of the release of considerable amounts nanoparticles into the environment almost every day, and for the ERC guidelines, investigations on the effect of GPN on aquatic organisms are critical. Some studies have found that GPN exhibited high toxicity to marine and freshwater algae, damaged organelles, enhanced ROS generation, induced nutrition depletion, and reduced photosynthetic pigment concentration (Hazeem et al 2016; Zhao et al 2017; De Marchi et al, 2018). We have also documented from the published literature included in this review that GPN was able to penetrate the chorion (both zebrafish and Japanese medaka) and reach the embryonic body in fish during development and causing DNA damage.…”
Section: Discussion and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Zhao et al reported that RGO was more toxic than GO to freshwater algae because the hydrophobic RGO more readily heteroagglomerated with algae. 17 RGO was reported to reduce the hatching rate of zebrash embryos and the length of larvae, while carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and GO had limited impact.…”
Section: 13mentioning
confidence: 99%