2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.11.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanistic study on comonomer effect in ethylene/1-hexene copolymerization with TiCl4/MgCl2 model Ziegler-Natta catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar phenomena have been found in the previous studies of our group on ethylene and propylene polymerizations with Mt-II/MMAO, where the [C * ]/[M] level was about 70% in the ethylene system and lower than 30% in propylene polymerization (see Table 5 ) [ 30 , 39 , 51 ] It has been explained that the active centers producing polypropylene should be loosely associated ion pairs but not contact ion pairs, since the high steric hindrance in active centers with contact ion pairs will prohibit coordination of the bulky propylene, but allow for ethylene coordination. Therefore, the lower [C*]/[M] level in propylene polymerization can be largely attributed to absence of contact ion pairs in its active center family.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar phenomena have been found in the previous studies of our group on ethylene and propylene polymerizations with Mt-II/MMAO, where the [C * ]/[M] level was about 70% in the ethylene system and lower than 30% in propylene polymerization (see Table 5 ) [ 30 , 39 , 51 ] It has been explained that the active centers producing polypropylene should be loosely associated ion pairs but not contact ion pairs, since the high steric hindrance in active centers with contact ion pairs will prohibit coordination of the bulky propylene, but allow for ethylene coordination. Therefore, the lower [C*]/[M] level in propylene polymerization can be largely attributed to absence of contact ion pairs in its active center family.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Detailed kinetics of zirconium catalyzed ethylene polymerization provides key information for understanding the mechanism of these important industrial processes. As indicated by Busico et al [ 50 , 51 ], the chain propagation constant ( k p ) can be calculated using the “deceptively simple” rate law (Equations (2) and (3)) as follows: R p = k [M] R p = k p [C*][M] where [M] is monomer equilibrium concentration, [E] = 0.085 mol/L in toluene at 50 °C and 0.1 MPa was used for the calculation [ 26 , 52 ]. Since the instant polymerization rate at the time of TPCC quenching ( t p = 20 min) was not determined, the average R p value calculated from the polymer yield after 20 min polymerization and the catalyst amount has been used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…[39] In ethylene polymerization with Cat-1/TEA, the [C*]/[Ti] fraction rose from 25 % at 30 s to 60 % after 600 s polymerization, [32] but [C*]/[Ti] of propylene polymerization with this catalyst rose for more than 3 times in 600 s. The increase of [C*]/[Ti] with time has been explained by gradual exposure of shielded Ti species through disintegration of the catalyst particle by hydraulic forces of expanding propagation chains. [32,37,44,45] A possible example of shielded Ti species is shown in Scheme 2a, where the adsorbed TiCl 4 (B) on a MgCl 2 crystallite bridges with a neighboring MgCl 2 crystallite and becomes inaccessible to the cocatalyst. When the growing polymer chains on the nearby active centers expand the gap between the MgCl 2 crystallites, the bridging structure is broken, making the TiCl 4 (B) available to activation.…”
Section: Active Center Models and Mechanistic Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, limited by the low loadings as well as the amorphous silica support, the direct characterization of the surface active sites of catalyst including the catalyst H 2 ‐TPR (temperature‐programmed reduction) was failed. As a useful and reliable method, the Flory peak fitting based on the GPC curves has been applied to study properties of the multiple active centers of TiCl 4 /MgCl 2 type Ziegler–Natta [ 35–37 ] and Phillips catalyst. [ 6,31,34 ] The numbers of Schultz–Flory components are used to appraise theoretical site types distribution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%