Starting from picolinic acids 3 and 4, the amino acid‐derived 2‐aminoacylpyridine N‐oxides 1a,c–e and 2,6‐bis(aminoacyl)pyridine N‐oxides 2b–e can be prepared in two steps by the coupling of picolinic acid N‐oxides 5 and 6 under Appel conditions with the corresponding L‐amino acid ester or (1R,2S)‐norephedrine. Compounds 1 and 2 were used as chiral ligands in two different asymmetric catalyses. In the catalytic addition of diethylzinc to benzaldehyde 11, low enantioselectivities (2–29% ee) were obtained regardless of the amino acid moiety. However, the corresponding 2,6‐bis(aminoacyl)pyridines 7 and 8 led to increased ee values (55% ee). In the catalytic reduction of ketones 9a–c to alcohols 10a–c low enantioselectivities were observed for alanine‐, valine‐, and leucine‐derived N‐oxides 1a,c and 2b,c. An increase of selectivity was observed for bis‐methionine ligand 2d (32–38% ee) relative to that of mono‐methionine ligand 1d (7–16% ee). However, mono‐norephedrine ligand 1e (≤ 64% ee) and the corresponding bis‐norephedrine ligand 2e (≤ 51% ee) displayed the highest selectivities. The influence of the N‐oxide moiety on the enantioselectivity was demonstrated by the observation that 2,6‐bis(aminoacyl)pyridines 7 and 8 gave much lower selectivities than the corresponding pyridine N‐oxides 2d and e.