1980
DOI: 10.1021/ic50213a006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanistic studies of oxidative addition to low-valent metal complexes. Stereochemistry at carbon in addition of alkyl halides to iridium(I)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
27
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the similarities, the oxidative addition reported here displays obvious differences from the oxidative addition investigated by Labinger and Osborn. The photoreaction of [IrCl(CO)(PMe 3 ) 2 ] with chloroform proceeded with addition of the entire CHCl 3 molecule to yield [IrCl 2 (CO)(CHCl 2 )(PMe 3 ) 2 ] (26), whereas we find the product with the triphenylphosphine complex to be [IrCl 2 (CO)H(PPh 3 ) 2 ]. Of particular interest, though, is the fact that Labinger and Osborn reported no reaction when CH 2 Cl 2 was substituted for CHCl 3 (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Despite the similarities, the oxidative addition reported here displays obvious differences from the oxidative addition investigated by Labinger and Osborn. The photoreaction of [IrCl(CO)(PMe 3 ) 2 ] with chloroform proceeded with addition of the entire CHCl 3 molecule to yield [IrCl 2 (CO)(CHCl 2 )(PMe 3 ) 2 ] (26), whereas we find the product with the triphenylphosphine complex to be [IrCl 2 (CO)H(PPh 3 ) 2 ]. Of particular interest, though, is the fact that Labinger and Osborn reported no reaction when CH 2 Cl 2 was substituted for CHCl 3 (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The photoreaction of [IrCl(CO)(PMe 3 ) 2 ] with chloroform proceeded with addition of the entire CHCl 3 molecule to yield [IrCl 2 (CO)(CHCl 2 )(PMe 3 ) 2 ] (26), whereas we find the product with the triphenylphosphine complex to be [IrCl 2 (CO)H(PPh 3 ) 2 ]. Of particular interest, though, is the fact that Labinger and Osborn reported no reaction when CH 2 Cl 2 was substituted for CHCl 3 (26). The reason lies presumably in the greater C–Cl bond strength in dichloromethane, and in the fact that the oxidative addition of CCl 4 , in which the C–Cl bond is even weaker, took place instantaneously (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Chlorine abstraction from chloroalkanes by metal complexes has been seen in other systems [49,50], but the feasibility of chlorine atom transfer in this case clearly depends on the relative bond strengths for homolytic cleavage of the Pd-Cl and C-Cl bonds. In chloroform, the latter is 339 kJ M À1 [51], while the Pd-Cl bond energy in PdCl 2À 4 has been estimated to lie between 339 and 351 kJ M À1 [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%