2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.09.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanistic simulation study of air injection assisted cyclic steam stimulation through horizontal wells for ultra heavy oil reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…they can be only safely and economically applied to the select few reservoirs having pay thicknesses of at least 15 m (Gates 2010;Zhao et al 2013Zhao et al , 2014. In addition to that, these technologies are not environmentally friendly as they emit substantial amount of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) in the period of steam generation, have low efficiencies since they suffer from considerable wellbore heat losses, require considerable waste water handling and purification, and they do not provide appreciable oil upgrading within the reservoir (Gates and Larter 2014;Shi et al 2017;Wang et al 2019). Furthermore, in some of the field pilot cases, SAGD was shown to not be a net energy producer (Gates and Larter 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…they can be only safely and economically applied to the select few reservoirs having pay thicknesses of at least 15 m (Gates 2010;Zhao et al 2013Zhao et al , 2014. In addition to that, these technologies are not environmentally friendly as they emit substantial amount of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) in the period of steam generation, have low efficiencies since they suffer from considerable wellbore heat losses, require considerable waste water handling and purification, and they do not provide appreciable oil upgrading within the reservoir (Gates and Larter 2014;Shi et al 2017;Wang et al 2019). Furthermore, in some of the field pilot cases, SAGD was shown to not be a net energy producer (Gates and Larter 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some of the thermal enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes, such as the steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD), the cyclic steam stimulation (CSS), and the steam flooding (SF), are not without disadvantages. Their disadvantages include: (i) suffering from considerable overburden, wellbore, and underburden heat losses, (ii) generating large amount of CO 2 during steam generation, (iii) achieving minor heavy-to-light oil upgrading, (iv) being applicable to only select few reservoirs, (v) generating large amount of wastewater, and (vi) having a low recovery factor compared to in-situ-combustion-type processes (Gates, 2010;Gates and Larter, 2014;Shi et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2019;Zhao et al, 2014Zhao et al, , 2013. The in-situ-combustion-type processes, such as conventional in situ combustion (ISC) and toe-toheel air injection (THAI), have been shown to have none of the disadvantages of the steam-based processes and have been shown to have so many advantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, experts also show greater interest in the optimization of injection and production parameters of heavy oil steam flooding [30]. Some heavy oil recovery technologies with higher recovery efficiency have also been developed in combination with steam flooding [31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%